2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.10.23284189
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic modeling of brain metastases in NSCLC provides computational markers for personalized prediction of outcome

Abstract: Background: Intracranial progression after curative treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occurs from 10 to 50% and is difficult to manage, given the heterogeneity of clinical presentations and the variability of treatments available. The objective of this study was to develop a mechanistic model of intracranial progression to predict survival following a first brain metastasis (BM) event. Methods: Data included early-stage NSCLC patients treated with a curative intent who had a BM as the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is extremely difficult to accurately identify spatial tumor growth on a patient-specific level, especially under a treatment plan [10,11]. A considerable variety of mathematical models has helped to improve the understanding of biological principles in cancer growth and treatment response [12][13][14][15][16] and their predictive power [17,18]. Globally, lung cancer is the leading cancer-related mortality cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is extremely difficult to accurately identify spatial tumor growth on a patient-specific level, especially under a treatment plan [10,11]. A considerable variety of mathematical models has helped to improve the understanding of biological principles in cancer growth and treatment response [12][13][14][15][16] and their predictive power [17,18]. Globally, lung cancer is the leading cancer-related mortality cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%