2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic modeling, numerical simulation and validation of slag-layer growth in a coal-fired boiler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simple models mentioned above do not consider particle size or velocity in their sticking criteria and thus may not be widely applicable. Models considering particle or surface properties as well as the size and velocity of the particles to determine sticking or rebound have been developed for impact of elastic–plastic materials, purely elastic materials, viscoelastic materials, , and molten materials (droplets). Some have been applied to ash deposit formation models. ,− , The models generally describe the impact by an energy balance, considering the kinetic energy of the particles, the energy lost by deformation of the particle or surface, the contact area established, and the adhesion energy of the contact area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple models mentioned above do not consider particle size or velocity in their sticking criteria and thus may not be widely applicable. Models considering particle or surface properties as well as the size and velocity of the particles to determine sticking or rebound have been developed for impact of elastic–plastic materials, purely elastic materials, viscoelastic materials, , and molten materials (droplets). Some have been applied to ash deposit formation models. ,− , The models generally describe the impact by an energy balance, considering the kinetic energy of the particles, the energy lost by deformation of the particle or surface, the contact area established, and the adhesion energy of the contact area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental verification of Equation ( 5) was not deemed necessary at the time of compiling the current work since, first and foremost, it is a derivation of Equation (2), which was previously proposed by the authors [21]. Secondly, the above-mentioned NSI has already been validated by others [64][65][66][67]. However, the necessity of such verification is recognized and has yet to be implemented in the authors' future work.…”
Section: Quantification Of the Absolute Deposition Tendency Across The Studied Domainmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Equation ( 5) was modified from Equation ( 2) such that the ADTs calculated by Equation ( 2) were normalized by the ash content per MJ of feedstock [kg/MJ] (calculated from the ash content and the respective lower heating value (LHV) of the raw/bio-oil/biochar). A similar numerical slagging index (NSI), which was primarily developed to determine the effect of incoming ash particles, was recently extended to and experimentally verified for coal/biomass blends by others [64][65][66][67]. The NSI bears a considerable resemblance to Equation (5) in that it too relates the slagging tendency to the reciprocal of ash viscosity and is directly proportional to the ash loading, i.e., the amount of input ash per hour [64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Quantification Of the Absolute Deposition Tendency Across The Studied Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since not all the coals are made up with the same mineral components, it is required to have user defined function to simulate the slag growth. It is important to understand how much energy does the slag droplet has in order to predict its mechanistic bouncing potential after impact [7]. Table 1 highlighted the existing numerical slagging indices correlation which used the proximate analysis of the coal ash in order to calculate the slagging indices proposed in the earlier studies.…”
Section: Numerical Slagging Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%