Abstract:The acetate-initiated aliphatic isocyanate trimerization to isocyanurate was investigated by state-of-the-art analytical and computational methods. Although the common cyclotrimerization mechanism assumes the consecutive addition of three equivalents of isocyanate to acetate prior to product formation, we found that the underlying mechanism is more complex. In this work, we demonstrate that the product, in fact, is formed via the connection of two unexpected catalytic cycles, with acetate being only the precat… Show more
“…Therefore, forming olefin 6′ does not end the catalytic isocyanurate formation, but instead changes the catalytically active species from the deprotonated amide to deprotonated urea in agreement with findings for aliphatic isocyanates. 41 Then, we studied the trimerization reaction experimentally in THF and toluene at room temperature to verify our mechanistic hypothesis. For experiments, we chose phenyl and p-tolyl isocyanates as model substrates and tetrabutylammonium acetate (TBAA) as catalyst because of their high solubility in both solvents.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…While in the catalytic cycle on the right, the active species cannot undergo similar catalyst migrations as previously, the allophanate isocyanate intermediate 3′ is interestingly predicted to reversibly form the cyclized anion 3″ , which we consider to lead to the formation of electron-poor N-heterocyclic olefin 6′ in agreement with recent findings in the cyclotrimerization of aliphatic isocyanates. 41 The total reaction yields one molar equivalent of hydroxyl anions, but we assume the reaction to proceed via first protonating 3′ by a trace amount of proton sources and then fragmenting water. Water and hydroxyl anions are well known to lead to the formation of urea first by hydrolyzing isocyanate to carbamic acid and forming an aromatic amine after fragmentation of CO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, forming olefin 6′ does not end the catalytic isocyanurate formation, but instead changes the catalytically active species from the deprotonated amide to deprotonated urea in agreement with findings for aliphatic isocyanates. 41 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 , 19 , 40 Recently, Siebert et al also suggested that the catalytically active species originating from acetate anions changes several times during the cyclotrimerization of aliphatic isocyanates. 41 The exact species that catalyze cyclotrimerization of aromatic isocyanates, however, has not been explicitly characterized so far, which hampers the development of new PIR catalysts suitable for large-scale polyurethane production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies consider the catalytically active species to be the acetate anion itself, , but, on the other hand, Hoffman’s early experimental work indicated that acetate anions are quickly converted to acetanilide when reacting with aromatic isocyanates, which in turn could potentially act as the anionic catalysts in the active cycle . Further, as the acetanilide anion can be expected to deprotonate urethane, allophanate, urea, and biuret groups in the PU matrix depending on their relative acidities, and their corresponding anions have been shown to be active PIR catalysts, the catalytically active species is expected to change several times during the polymerization. ,, Recently, Siebert et al also suggested that the catalytically active species originating from acetate anions changes several times during the cyclotrimerization of aliphatic isocyanates . The exact species that catalyze cyclotrimerization of aromatic isocyanates, however, has not been explicitly characterized so far, which hampers the development of new PIR catalysts suitable for large-scale polyurethane production.…”
The
formation of isocyanurates via cyclotrimerization of aromatic
isocyanates is widely used to enhance the physical properties of a
variety of polyurethanes. The most commonly used catalysts in industries
are carboxylates for which the exact catalytically active species
have remained controversial. We investigated how acetate and other
carboxylates react with aromatic isocyanates in a stepwise manner
and identified that the carboxylates are only precatalysts in the
reaction. The reaction of carboxylates with an excess of aromatic
isocyanates leads to irreversible formation of corresponding deprotonated
amide species that are strongly nucleophilic and basic. As a result,
they are active catalysts during the nucleophilic anionic trimerization,
but can also deprotonate urethane and urea species present, which
in turn catalyze the isocyanurate formation. The current study also
shows how quantum chemical calculations can be used to direct spectroscopic
identification of reactive intermediates formed during the active
catalytic cycle with predictive accuracy.
“…Therefore, forming olefin 6′ does not end the catalytic isocyanurate formation, but instead changes the catalytically active species from the deprotonated amide to deprotonated urea in agreement with findings for aliphatic isocyanates. 41 Then, we studied the trimerization reaction experimentally in THF and toluene at room temperature to verify our mechanistic hypothesis. For experiments, we chose phenyl and p-tolyl isocyanates as model substrates and tetrabutylammonium acetate (TBAA) as catalyst because of their high solubility in both solvents.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…While in the catalytic cycle on the right, the active species cannot undergo similar catalyst migrations as previously, the allophanate isocyanate intermediate 3′ is interestingly predicted to reversibly form the cyclized anion 3″ , which we consider to lead to the formation of electron-poor N-heterocyclic olefin 6′ in agreement with recent findings in the cyclotrimerization of aliphatic isocyanates. 41 The total reaction yields one molar equivalent of hydroxyl anions, but we assume the reaction to proceed via first protonating 3′ by a trace amount of proton sources and then fragmenting water. Water and hydroxyl anions are well known to lead to the formation of urea first by hydrolyzing isocyanate to carbamic acid and forming an aromatic amine after fragmentation of CO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, forming olefin 6′ does not end the catalytic isocyanurate formation, but instead changes the catalytically active species from the deprotonated amide to deprotonated urea in agreement with findings for aliphatic isocyanates. 41 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 , 19 , 40 Recently, Siebert et al also suggested that the catalytically active species originating from acetate anions changes several times during the cyclotrimerization of aliphatic isocyanates. 41 The exact species that catalyze cyclotrimerization of aromatic isocyanates, however, has not been explicitly characterized so far, which hampers the development of new PIR catalysts suitable for large-scale polyurethane production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies consider the catalytically active species to be the acetate anion itself, , but, on the other hand, Hoffman’s early experimental work indicated that acetate anions are quickly converted to acetanilide when reacting with aromatic isocyanates, which in turn could potentially act as the anionic catalysts in the active cycle . Further, as the acetanilide anion can be expected to deprotonate urethane, allophanate, urea, and biuret groups in the PU matrix depending on their relative acidities, and their corresponding anions have been shown to be active PIR catalysts, the catalytically active species is expected to change several times during the polymerization. ,, Recently, Siebert et al also suggested that the catalytically active species originating from acetate anions changes several times during the cyclotrimerization of aliphatic isocyanates . The exact species that catalyze cyclotrimerization of aromatic isocyanates, however, has not been explicitly characterized so far, which hampers the development of new PIR catalysts suitable for large-scale polyurethane production.…”
The
formation of isocyanurates via cyclotrimerization of aromatic
isocyanates is widely used to enhance the physical properties of a
variety of polyurethanes. The most commonly used catalysts in industries
are carboxylates for which the exact catalytically active species
have remained controversial. We investigated how acetate and other
carboxylates react with aromatic isocyanates in a stepwise manner
and identified that the carboxylates are only precatalysts in the
reaction. The reaction of carboxylates with an excess of aromatic
isocyanates leads to irreversible formation of corresponding deprotonated
amide species that are strongly nucleophilic and basic. As a result,
they are active catalysts during the nucleophilic anionic trimerization,
but can also deprotonate urethane and urea species present, which
in turn catalyze the isocyanurate formation. The current study also
shows how quantum chemical calculations can be used to direct spectroscopic
identification of reactive intermediates formed during the active
catalytic cycle with predictive accuracy.
The formation of isocyanurate via cyclotrimerization of isocyanates is widely reported to provide a variety of polyurethane materials with improved chemical and physical properties such as weatherability, mechanical properties, thermal stability and flame retardancy. The demand for development of effective and selective catalysts for cyclotrimerization of isocyanates has been increasing. This review comprehensively summarizes catalysts for the cyclotrimerization of isocyanates that have been reported in peer‐reviewed publications and provides a valuable guideline for choosing suitable catalysts to match specific requirements. The catalysts are categorized into two main classes: catalysts operating via a Lewis basic cyclotrimerization mechanism and metal‐containing catalysts. Catalyst structures, reaction conditions, reaction time, catalytic effectivity as well as types of isocyanates whose trimerization is catalyzed are described in detail. In addition, featuring the findings and viewpoints from mechanistic studies, this review aims to stimulate the design and development of new, more efficient catalysts, and to guide further study of the trimerization mechanism with different classes of catalysts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.