2017
DOI: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic Insights Into Catalytic RNA–Protein Complexes Involved in Translation of the Genetic Code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 253 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, in the signal recognition particle, the RNA bears the burden of scaffolding and promotes the interaction with the SRP receptor, while a protein subunit works as the enzymatic moiety performing GTP hydrolysis (Peluso et al, 2000). In the ribosome, rRNA usually excels in both duties, serving as the skeleton and the catalytic heart of this giant complex, whereas proteins are relegated to secondary roles (Ban et al, 2000;Muth et al, 2000;Nissen et al, 2000;Routh and Sankaranarayanan, 2017). However, mitochondrial ribosomes often deviate from this rule: in the extreme case of trypanosomatids, the mitochondrial rRNA has suffered such profound structural erosion that the scaffolding task almost entirely falls to the hypertrophied protein shell (Ramrath et al, 2018;Soufari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Class I: Constitutive Rnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, in the signal recognition particle, the RNA bears the burden of scaffolding and promotes the interaction with the SRP receptor, while a protein subunit works as the enzymatic moiety performing GTP hydrolysis (Peluso et al, 2000). In the ribosome, rRNA usually excels in both duties, serving as the skeleton and the catalytic heart of this giant complex, whereas proteins are relegated to secondary roles (Ban et al, 2000;Muth et al, 2000;Nissen et al, 2000;Routh and Sankaranarayanan, 2017). However, mitochondrial ribosomes often deviate from this rule: in the extreme case of trypanosomatids, the mitochondrial rRNA has suffered such profound structural erosion that the scaffolding task almost entirely falls to the hypertrophied protein shell (Ramrath et al, 2018;Soufari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Class I: Constitutive Rnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a peptide bond is formed between the A-site amino acid (of aa-tRNA) and the P-site peptidyl moiety (of the pt-tRNA), with a concomitant deacylation of tRNA and the translocation of the mRNA by a codon, thereby preparing the ribosome for the next round of polypeptide elongation (85,86). The newly formed peptidyl moiety of pt-tRNA will now have one amino acid more than the earlier pt-tRNA (87,88). In this plethora of events of peptide synthesis, how D-aa-tRNAs are treated by the ribosome is of specific interest and is essential for tweaking the ribosome for making noncanonical peptides.…”
Section: Ribosomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these proofreading factors, D-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase (DTD) is the one that specifically decouples wrongly acylated D-amino acids from tRNAs ( Calendar and Berg, 1967 ; Soutourina et al, 1999 ; 2000 ). Our studies have shown that DTD is an RNA-based catalyst that uses an invariant Gly- cis Pro motif as a ‘chiral selectivity filter’ to achieve substrate chiral specificity only through rejection of L-amino acid from the active site, thereby leading to Gly-tRNA Gly misediting ( Ahmad et al, 2013 ; Routh et al, 2016 ; Routh and Sankaranarayanan, 2017 ). Recently, we have also shown that DTD’s activity on achiral glycine helps in clearing Gly-tRNA Ala , a misaminoacylation product of alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AlaRS), thus resolving a long-standing question in translational quality control ( Pawar et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%