No. 2155, pp. 43-54) is reproduced from. This work would not have been possible without the support of my friends and colleagues. I am thankful to Jonathan Howson, with whom I worked closely and who made my stay in College Station more enjoyable. Finally, thanks to my family for their patience, support, and love. Also thanks to my friends, whether in the U.S. or back in Taiwan, for their encouragement and support. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page I 5.12 The comparision between field and predicted results for LMH severity distress (AC over AC pavement structure, Wet-Freeze climatic zone) •••••••• 5.13 The comparision between field and predicted results for LMH severity distress (AC over JPC pavement structure, Wet-Freeze climatic zone) ••••••• 5.14 The comparision between field and predicted results for MH severity distress (AC over JPC pavement structure, Wet-Freeze climatic zone) ••••••• 5.15 The comparision between field and predicted results for LMH severity distress (AC over FC pavement structure, Wet-Freeze climatic zone)••••••••• 5.16 The comparision between field and predicted results for MH severity distress (AC over FC pavement structure, Wet-Freeze climatic zone)••••••••• 5.17 The comparision between field and predicted results for LMH severity distress (AC over CRC pavement structure, Wet-Freeze climatic zone) •••••• 5.18 The comparision between field and predicted results for MH severity distress (AC over CRC pavement structure, Wet-Freeze climatic zone) •••••• xix FIGURE Page 5.19 The comparision between field and predicted results for LMH severity distress (AC over reinforcing interlayer over PCC pavement structure, Wet-Freeze climatic zone) •