2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1897375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic and kinetic study of the CH3CO+O2 reaction

Abstract: Potential-energy surface of the CH3CO + O2 reaction has been calculated by ab initio quantum chemistry methods. The geometries were optimized using the second-order Moller-Plesset theory (MP2) with the 6-311G(d,p) basis set and the coupled-cluster theory with single and double excitations (CCSD) with the correlation consistent polarized valence double zeta (cc-pVDZ) basis set. The relative energies were calculated using the Gaussian-3 second-order Moller-Plesset theory with the CCSD/cc-pVDZ geometries. Multire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
42
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
42
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The CH 3 C(O)OH data confirm that at zero pressure the OH yield is approximately unity, as evidenced by the intercept in Figure 2 which is (1.07 ± 0.24). This result is supported by the theoretical calculations of Lee et al [11] and Hou et al [10] where at room temperature, OH is almost exclusively the bimolecular product; the yield of HO 2 +CH 2 CO, the next most facile bimolecular channel, was calculated by Hou et al [10] to be ≤ 1%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The CH 3 C(O)OH data confirm that at zero pressure the OH yield is approximately unity, as evidenced by the intercept in Figure 2 which is (1.07 ± 0.24). This result is supported by the theoretical calculations of Lee et al [11] and Hou et al [10] where at room temperature, OH is almost exclusively the bimolecular product; the yield of HO 2 +CH 2 CO, the next most facile bimolecular channel, was calculated by Hou et al [10] to be ≤ 1%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…one and a half less quenching of CH 3 CO(O 2 )* than the work from Tyndall et al [8,22] and ca. two and a half less quenching than the work from Hou et al [10]. The reasons for this discrepancy are not clear.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations