Mechanisms of temperature-dependent swimming: the importance of physics, physiology and body size in determining protist swimming speed

Abstract

SUMMARYBody temperatures and thus physiological rates of poikilothermic organisms are determined by environmental temperature. The power an organism has available for swimming is largely dependent on physiological rates and thus body temperature. However, retarding forces such as drag are contingent on the temperature-dependent physical properties of water and on an organism's size. Consequently, the swimming ability of poikilotherms is highly temperature dependent. The importance of the temperaturedependent physical properties of water (e.g. viscosity) in determining swimming speed is poorly understood. Here we propose a semi-mechanistic model to describe how biological rates, size and the physics of the environment contribute to the temperature dependency of microbial swimming speed. Data on the swimming speed and size of a predatory protist and its protist prey were collected and used to test our model. Data were collected by manipulating both the temperature and the viscosity (independently of temperature) of the organism's environment. Protists were either cultured in their test environment (for several generations) or rapidly exposed to their test environment to assess their ability to adapt or acclimate to treatments. Both biological rates and the physics of the environment were predicted to and observed to contribute to the swimming speed of protists. Body size was not temperature dependent, and protists expressed some ability to acclimate to changes in either temperature or viscosity. Overall, using our parameter estimates and novel model, we are able to suggest that 30 to 40% (depending on species) of the response in swimming speed associated with a reduction in temperature from 20 to 5°C is due to viscosity. Because encounter rates between protist predators and their prey are determined by swimming speed, temperature-and viscosity-dependent swimming speeds are likely to result in temperature-and viscosity-dependent trophic interactions. Supplementary material available online at

Is metabolic rate a universal ‘pacemaker’ for biological processes?

“…2. physiological stress, changes in kinematic viscosity, and effects on diffusion rates) and the effects of various behavioural and physiological processes on thermoregulation (Bȇlehrádek, 1957;Cossins & Bowler, 1987;Sidell & Hazel, 1987;Hunt von Herbing, 2002;Woods & Hill, 2004;Angilletta, 2009;Larsen & Riisgård, 2009;Beveridge, Petchey & Humphries, 2010;Humphries, 2013). In this schematic representation of the Adaptable Informed Resource Use (AIRU) model proposed here (see Section V.9), note the multi-directional cause and effect relationships (indicated by double arrows) among body size, temperature, the rates of metabolism and other biological processes, and various other ecological factors and effects.…”

Big answers from small worlds: a user's guide for protist microcosms as a model system in ecology and evolution

“…Fenchel & Finlay 1983) or movement speed (e.g. Beveridge, Petchey & Humphries 2010b), on population and community dynamics (e.g. Fussmann et al 2014), an on affecting ecosystem processes, such as net primary production (Petchey et al 1999; Fig.…”

Why polar gigantism and Palaeozoic gigantism are not equivalent: effects of oxygen and temperature on the body size of ectotherms

“…Effects of water viscosity have been mainly studied in relation to swimming, where viscous drag forces reduce swimming performance (Fuiman & Batty 1997). Viscosity becomes more important in cold water (von Herbing 2002) and in smaller organisms (Podolsky & Emlet 1993;M€ uller, Stamhuis & Videler 2000;Larsen, Madsen & Riisg ard 2008;Beveridge, Petchey & Humphries 2010). Swimming efficiency increases rapidly with increasing body size, as mass-specific energetic costs decline (Kaufmann 1990).…”