Abstract:Vegetation on railway or highway slopes can improve slope stability through the generation of soil pore water suctions by plant transpiration and mechanical soil reinforcement by the roots. To incorporate the enhanced shearing resistance and stiffness of root-reinforced soils in stability calculations, it is necessary to understand and quantify its effectiveness. This requires integrated and sophisticated experimental and multi-scale modelling approaches to develop an understanding of the processes at differen… Show more
“…After DVC processing, full-field data containing displacements, normal strain and shear strain components were post-processed using a custom MATLAB script. A study was carried out to optimize the DVC sub-volume size for reliable correlation, error caused by noise, strain measurement accuracy and spatial resolution [21]. This found that it was necessary to correlate adjacent scans in the XCT dataset (rather than e.g.…”
Section: (C) Dvcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum subset size achievable was 32 pixels cubed, and for subsets of this size noise was found to accumulate linearly with the number of displacement steps in the sequence, with the largest strain standard deviation reaching 38 millistrain at the end of the test. The subset size and noise sensitivity study is described in detail in [21]. The 75% overlap in the subset size meant that displacement was calculated on a three-dimensional grid of eight pixels or 0.37 mm.…”
Section: (C) Dvcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting soil-root interface stress (τ in the Waldron model) can be taken as purely frictional, based on the normal stress within the soil and an estimate of the interface friction angle. However, this neglects root branching and lateral roots that anchor the root system into the soil and are likely to increase τ [21,22]. Appropriate values of τ that take into account these effects will vary with plant root morphology and soil type, and are not well characterized.…”
Vegetation enhances soil shearing resistance through water uptake and root reinforcement. Analytical models for soils reinforced with roots rely on input parameters that are difficult to measure, leading to widely varying predictions of behaviour. The opaque heterogeneous nature of rooted soils results in complex soil–root interaction mechanisms that cannot easily be quantified. The authors measured, for the first time, the shear resistance and deformations of fallow, willow-rooted and gorse-rooted soils during direct shear using X-ray computed tomography and digital volume correlation. Both species caused an increase in shear zone thickness, both initially and as shear progressed. Shear zone thickness peaked at up to 35 mm, often close to the thickest roots and towards the centre of the column. Root extension during shear was 10–30% less than the tri-linear root profile assumed in a Waldron-type model, owing to root curvature. Root analogues used to explore the root–soil interface behaviour suggested that root lateral branches play an important role in anchoring the roots. The Waldron-type model was modified to incorporate non-uniform shear zone thickness and growth, and accurately predicted the observed, up to sevenfold, increase in shear resistance of root-reinforced soil.
“…After DVC processing, full-field data containing displacements, normal strain and shear strain components were post-processed using a custom MATLAB script. A study was carried out to optimize the DVC sub-volume size for reliable correlation, error caused by noise, strain measurement accuracy and spatial resolution [21]. This found that it was necessary to correlate adjacent scans in the XCT dataset (rather than e.g.…”
Section: (C) Dvcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum subset size achievable was 32 pixels cubed, and for subsets of this size noise was found to accumulate linearly with the number of displacement steps in the sequence, with the largest strain standard deviation reaching 38 millistrain at the end of the test. The subset size and noise sensitivity study is described in detail in [21]. The 75% overlap in the subset size meant that displacement was calculated on a three-dimensional grid of eight pixels or 0.37 mm.…”
Section: (C) Dvcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting soil-root interface stress (τ in the Waldron model) can be taken as purely frictional, based on the normal stress within the soil and an estimate of the interface friction angle. However, this neglects root branching and lateral roots that anchor the root system into the soil and are likely to increase τ [21,22]. Appropriate values of τ that take into account these effects will vary with plant root morphology and soil type, and are not well characterized.…”
Vegetation enhances soil shearing resistance through water uptake and root reinforcement. Analytical models for soils reinforced with roots rely on input parameters that are difficult to measure, leading to widely varying predictions of behaviour. The opaque heterogeneous nature of rooted soils results in complex soil–root interaction mechanisms that cannot easily be quantified. The authors measured, for the first time, the shear resistance and deformations of fallow, willow-rooted and gorse-rooted soils during direct shear using X-ray computed tomography and digital volume correlation. Both species caused an increase in shear zone thickness, both initially and as shear progressed. Shear zone thickness peaked at up to 35 mm, often close to the thickest roots and towards the centre of the column. Root extension during shear was 10–30% less than the tri-linear root profile assumed in a Waldron-type model, owing to root curvature. Root analogues used to explore the root–soil interface behaviour suggested that root lateral branches play an important role in anchoring the roots. The Waldron-type model was modified to incorporate non-uniform shear zone thickness and growth, and accurately predicted the observed, up to sevenfold, increase in shear resistance of root-reinforced soil.
“…The first set of data consisted of laboratory direct shear tests on soil reinforced by juvenile willow, gorse and festulolium grass grown under laboratory conditions (Liang et al 2017), Bull et al (2020). In the following, first author initials 'TL' and 'DB' are used to differentiate tests conducted by Liang et al and Bull et al.…”
Purpose
The mechanical contribution of plant roots to the soil shear strength is commonly modelled using fibre bundle models (FBM), accounting for sequential breakage of roots. This study provides a generic framework, able to includes the many different existing approaches, to quantify the effect of various model assumptions.
Methods
The framework uses (1) a single model parameter determining how load is shared between all roots, (2) a continuous power-law distribution of root area ratio over a range of root diameters, and (3) power-law relationships between root diameters and biomechanical properties. A new load sharing parameter, closely resembling how roots mobilise strength under landslide conditions, is proposed. Exact analytical solutions were found for the peak root reinforcement, thus eliminating the current need for iterative algorithms. Model assumptions and results were validated against existing biomechanical and root reinforcement data.
Results
Root reinforcements proved very sensitive to the user-defined load sharing parameter. It is shown that the current method of discretising all roots in discrete diameter classes prior to reinforcement calculations leads to significant overestimations of reinforcement. Addition of a probabilistic distribution of root failure by means of Weibull survival functions, thus adding a second source of sequential mobilisation, further reduced predicted reinforcements, but only when the reduction due to load sharing was limited.
Conclusion
The presented solutions greatly simplify root reinforcement calculations while maintaining analytical exactness as well as clarity in the assumptions made. The proposed standardisation of fibre bundle-type models will greatly aid comparison and exchange of data.
“…To capture the behavior of soil and soil-root interactions, it is necessary to obtain deformation information from the bulk of the soil (Bull et al, 2020). Advanced experimental methods using imaging techniques (e.g., X-ray Computed Tomography (XCT) or time lapse synchrotron X-ray Computed Tomography (4D CT)) have been shown to work well for capturing three-dimensional information of soils and roots (Perret et al, 2007;Peth et al, 2010;Keyes et al, 2017).…”
The quantitative kinematic description of the surrounding soil particles during root growth is a technical challenge and biologically important. In this study, a two-dimensional camera-based imaging system was used to observe micro scale interactions between plant roots and soil particles. Maize root tip was imaged during ingress into the soils. This produced a series of twodimensional images that represent temporal resolution of the geometric soil and root configurations at the micrometer scale. These images were used as inputs for full-field kinematic quantification methods, which enabled the analysis of two-dimensional deformation of the soils around elongating root. Correlationbased discrete object tracking and contour updating were used to track the shapes and the locations of soil particles and soil aggregates, while incremental digital image correlation was proposed to extract deformation and strain field within soil particle and soil aggregate. These techniques allowed the full-field displacements and strains of the soil to be quantified and the changes in shapes of soil particles to be visualized. Experimental results show that the presented shape tracking scheme, incremental digital image correlation and the research findings will be useful for the measurement and quantification of soil particle kinematics of soil-root physical interactions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.