1970
DOI: 10.1115/1.3425091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Metal Removal by Impacting Dust Particles

Abstract: This is a two-part paper, which stresses the materials science approach to understanding dust erosion mechanisms. The first part is an experimental phase, studying the effects upon solid-particle erosion, of such material and environmental variables as target alloy composition and heat-treat condition; dust particle velocity, size, concentration, velocity, and kinetic energy; carrier-gas true temperature and impingement angle. All test variables and their limits were chosen to simulate the range of engineering… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the developed equation 3the erosion losses vary with the jet velocity to the power 2.55 at constant sand concentration. This agrees well with Finnie's indication in reference [2] that the values of velocity exponent from 2.05 to 2.44 are more realistic. c) Correlated equation (4) gives that the erosion produced by a given weight of dust is increased by decreasing concentrationaleads to more superimposed particles impacts, thus being less effective than if the same weight of dust is used with less concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the developed equation 3the erosion losses vary with the jet velocity to the power 2.55 at constant sand concentration. This agrees well with Finnie's indication in reference [2] that the values of velocity exponent from 2.05 to 2.44 are more realistic. c) Correlated equation (4) gives that the erosion produced by a given weight of dust is increased by decreasing concentrationaleads to more superimposed particles impacts, thus being less effective than if the same weight of dust is used with less concentration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For either the efficiency of erosion as related to the used mass of impacting particles or to the energy consumed by the jet, it has a maximum value at an impingement angle of 33 . b) Erosion losses vary with the jet velocity to the power 1.85 for a fixed quantity of abrasives, this is expected as the erosion loss per particle is directly proportional to the incoming particle's kinetic energy as illustrated in reference [2]. In the developed equation 3the erosion losses vary with the jet velocity to the power 2.55 at constant sand concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Aerosols have been identified to come from various sources: environment, equipment activities, smoking, cooking, etc. Malfunctioning of semiconductor [3], erosion in machinery [4] and health effects [5] are some of the important problems caused by deposition of particles. Inhaled particles can deposit in the respiratory tree [6] and trigger significant health problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Waldmann, 1 0 0 the diffusion-imposed force for a binary medium can be expressed as (53) where a12 is the diffusion slip factor, D 1 2 is the binary gas diffusion coefficient, and 4 is the concentration of the gas component which is being collected. Equating this force with the Stokes drag yields Vn = c 12012(-V0) (54) Both theoretical and empirical expressions are available 1 0 0 for al2 and D12, This result shows that the drift velocity is independent of particulate diameter and will increase with increasing temperature because of D12,…”
Section: Concentration Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%