The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of hearing loss resulting from middle-ear fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
135
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
39
135
4
Order By: Relevance
“…5A, B). Previous results have also shown that V U is attenuated by MEE more at higher stimulus frequencies than lower (Ravicz et al 2004). We also found that V U was influenced by the amount of TM that was covered by fluid.…”
Section: Tympanometry Measurements With Fluid In the Middle-ear Spacementioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5A, B). Previous results have also shown that V U is attenuated by MEE more at higher stimulus frequencies than lower (Ravicz et al 2004). We also found that V U was influenced by the amount of TM that was covered by fluid.…”
Section: Tympanometry Measurements With Fluid In the Middle-ear Spacementioning
confidence: 65%
“…This method of MEE simulation was adapted, in part, from the methods used by Goodhill and Holcomb (1958) and Hartley and Moore (2003). One viscosity of silicone oil was used (as opposed to a variety of viscosities) based on previous research that suggests that attenuation of sound as a result of middle-ear fluid depends mostly on fluid volume and not viscosity (Brown et al 1983;Wiederhold et al 1980;Marsh et al 1985;Ravicz et al 2004;Jeselsohn et al 2005;Thornton et al 2012). As a confirmation that the bullae were completely filled with fluid via this method, in some animals the silicone oil was mixed with food coloring.…”
Section: Umbo Velocity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4A vs. B) is consistent with presence of a conductive hearing loss, since the OAE response amplitude is attenuated twice, by an acoustic round trip through the middle ear (Qin et al 2010). The frequency trend of the hearing loss is also consistent, since the replacement of middle-ear air by fluid and/ or the slightly negative middle-ear pressures often associated with a non-patent Eustachian tube, will affect transmission of low frequencies more than high frequencies (Ravicz et al 2004;Gan et al 2006). A possible role of sympathetic innervation in the control of bone remodeling in the bulla (Sherman and Chole 2001) must also be considered in the etiology of the conductive hearing loss in the Dbh −/− mice.…”
Section: Resistance To Acoustic Injury In Dbh −/− Micesupporting
confidence: 57%