2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2006
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2006.384625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Autonomous Pipe-Surface Inspection Robot with Magnetic Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A classic combination for robot climbing tasks is the magnetic adhesion and wheel locomotion, e.g., in [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. The inherent characteristic of the magnetic components, typically permanent magnets, guarantee full time adherence without a power source or other auxiliary device, which is very convenient since the CR's weight is a crucial point in the project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classic combination for robot climbing tasks is the magnetic adhesion and wheel locomotion, e.g., in [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. The inherent characteristic of the magnetic components, typically permanent magnets, guarantee full time adherence without a power source or other auxiliary device, which is very convenient since the CR's weight is a crucial point in the project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, various kinds of appropriative pipeline robots [4][5][6] working inside or outside pipes are developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a few cm, this robot already failed, as the ferromagnetic rust was sticking to all parts of the magnetic wheelnot only destroying the rubber but also penetrating into the gears. For this reason, the idea to use magnetic wheeled robots with additional mechanisms for passing specific obstacles [1][2][3][4] had to be rejected very soon. The alternative of using magnets in the structure instead of magnetic wheels [5], which is slightly more dirt-resistant than magnetic wheels, had to be rejected as well, as these robots usually do not achieve the required mobility for the difficult topology that is formed by the uneven surface of several tubes and the specific geometry of the coal nozzles.…”
Section: Drawbacks Of Using Classical Climbing Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to find the most appropriate principle for the magnetic foot, the mechanisms used in classical climbing robots with magnetic adhesion and in manipulators for industrial robots were analyzed and compared against each other. Basically, three groups can be distinguished -electromagnets [6,7], assemblies with moving magnets [12,13] and lift mechanisms [1][2][3][4]14]. The lift mechanisms can be further divided according to the way of motion (either rotary [1], linear with spindles [2,3,14], linear with pulley/wire-transmissions [4] or linear with pneumatics/hydraulics).…”
Section: Magnetic Feet With Variable Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation