1973
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(73)90015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms mediating ipsilateral limb hyperflexion after cerebellar paravermal cortical ablation or cooling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Levels of spontaneous activity in interpositus neurones under chloralose anaesthesia similar to those found here were described by Yu, Tarnecki, Chambers, Liu & Konorski (1973). They found many cells with relatively slow spontaneous activity, and a number of antidromically identified units which were silent.…”
Section: Spontaneous Activity Of Interpositus Neuronessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Levels of spontaneous activity in interpositus neurones under chloralose anaesthesia similar to those found here were described by Yu, Tarnecki, Chambers, Liu & Konorski (1973). They found many cells with relatively slow spontaneous activity, and a number of antidromically identified units which were silent.…”
Section: Spontaneous Activity Of Interpositus Neuronessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The inactivation of the interposed nuclei downregulated the forelimb withdrawal response, and application of the chloride channel blocker picrotoxin upregulated this response. Related observations were made by Yu et al (1973). These authors found that activation of the interposed nuclei produced by cooling the intermediate cerebellar cortex in the cat caused forelimb hyperflexion.…”
Section: Intermediate Cerebellum and Flexion Movementsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…If the overlying inhibitory Purkinje neurons (19) are removed, any input to the deep cerebellar nucleus normally modulated by the damaged cortex would have an exaggerated effect on cells to which the deep cerebellar nuclei project. Thus, damage to the midline vernal region results in extensor jerks because such neurons as those of the lateral vestibular nucleus, which primarily excite extensor mo$r neumns (28), are unchecked; and a paravermal lesion leads to flexor jerks because the red nucleus, which facilitates flexor motor neuronal activity, is powerfully driven by the released interpositus neurons (63). During wakefulness a sudden external stimulus will incite a flexion movement or an exaggerated extensor posture depending upon whether the lesion is in the paravermal or verrnal cortex (35,63).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%