2000
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/58.2.290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms Involved in the Immunotoxicity Induced by Dermal Application of JP-8 Jet Fuel

Abstract: Dermal application of JP-8 jet fuel induces immune suppression. Classic delayed-type hypersensitivity as well as the induction of contact hypersensitivity to allergens applied to the shaved skin of JP-8-treated mice is suppressed. In addition, the ability of T cells isolated from JP-8-treated mice to proliferate in vitro is suppressed. Here we focused on further characterizing the immunotoxicity induced by JP-8 exposure and determining the mechanism involved. Suppression of T-cell proliferation was first noted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
47
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
13
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A good example is the induction of immune suppression that results after dermal exposure to volatile organic chemicals. We find that Th1-type immune reactions are suppressed following dermal application of jet fuel (55,56), and that injecting PAFR antagonists into jet fuel-treated mice blocks the induction of immune suppression (12). It is not clear whether mechanisms similar to those described here are involved, but these observations do suggest that the role of inflammatory mediators in activating immune suppression may be widespread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A good example is the induction of immune suppression that results after dermal exposure to volatile organic chemicals. We find that Th1-type immune reactions are suppressed following dermal application of jet fuel (55,56), and that injecting PAFR antagonists into jet fuel-treated mice blocks the induction of immune suppression (12). It is not clear whether mechanisms similar to those described here are involved, but these observations do suggest that the role of inflammatory mediators in activating immune suppression may be widespread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Aside from monocytes, the latter cell types tend to be involved in chronic or hypersensitivity reactions and are not generally observed in simple irritant dermatitis such as that induced by JP-8 (Gallucci et al, 2004). Furthermore, it is well known that JP-8 inhibits acquired immune responses (Ullrich and Lyons, 2000;Ramos et al, 2002Ramos et al, , 2007. CXC chemokines can be classified based on receptor specificity as either relatively strict neutrophil chemoattractants (CXCR1 or 2) or lymphocyte chemoattractants (CXCR3), wherein CXCR1/2 is associated with acute inflammation and PMN chemotaxis, and CXCR3 is associated with chronic inflammation (for review, see Baggiolini et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 We also know from previous work that application of other dermal immunotoxic agents, such as jet fuel induces immune suppression via a PAF-, COX-2-, and IL-10-dependent mechanism. 19,20 Many PUVA-induced effects (including immune suppression) may be attributable to the generation of PAF and/or PAF-like molecules by degradation of PC by reactive oxygen species. 9 For instance, phospholipase-A2, a key enzyme in PAF production, can be induced by UVB exposure 8 and possibly also by PUVA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%