2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms for Increasing the pH Buffering Capacity of an Acidic Ultisol by Crop Residue-Derived Biochars

Abstract: The effects and underlying mechanisms of crop residue-derived biochars on the pH buffering capacity (pHbuff) of an acidic Ultisol, with low pHbuff, were investigated through indoor incubation and simulated acidification experiments. The incorporation of biochars significantly increased soil pHbuff with the magnitude of the increase dependent on acid buffering capacity of the biochar incorporated to the soil. Cation release, resulting from the protonation of carboxyl groups on biochar surfaces and the dissoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher pH in each organic acid treatment with added biochar, relative to that in its no-added biochar counterpart, may be attributed to this effect though acid neutralization by the alkaline materials contained in the biochar might also be important. The protonation of biochar surfaces was likely to drive the change of the biochar surfaces from a negatively charged-dominated status to a neutral-or positively chargeddominated status (Qian et al, 2016;Shi et al, 2017;Mia et al, 2018). As such, the biochar surfaces were no longer attractive to the cationic heavy metals and this explains why the heavy metals mobilized by LMWOAs were not removed from the solution in the presence of the biochar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher pH in each organic acid treatment with added biochar, relative to that in its no-added biochar counterpart, may be attributed to this effect though acid neutralization by the alkaline materials contained in the biochar might also be important. The protonation of biochar surfaces was likely to drive the change of the biochar surfaces from a negatively charged-dominated status to a neutral-or positively chargeddominated status (Qian et al, 2016;Shi et al, 2017;Mia et al, 2018). As such, the biochar surfaces were no longer attractive to the cationic heavy metals and this explains why the heavy metals mobilized by LMWOAs were not removed from the solution in the presence of the biochar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rebound of pyOM pH back to more circumneutral conditions (pH 6.0-7.2) by the end of the study was congruent with eventual loss of acidic exogenous materials via their neutralization through the ingress of basic cations mobilized by root exudates into the pyOM. The difference in the absolute magnitudes of pH declines and subsequent rebound observed across fire history can be reasonably explained as a fire-induced soil buffering effect; where previous burning imparts a higher soil buffering capacity to soils in the burnt zone (Mukherjee et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2014;Shi et al, 2017Shi et al, , 2018. The source of this buffering would be increased cation exchange capacity and basic cation content arising from higher soil carbon and ash-contained basic cations contents accumulating over progressive burns.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Pyom Ph and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordantly, in four amendment biochars produced from corn-straw, canola-straw, rice-straw, and peanut-straw, pH could increase from 4.96 to 6.69, 6.78, 7.45 and 8.40 and soil pH buffering capacity from 12.52 to 23.33, 23.14, 30.49 and 37.37mmol kg−1 pH−1, respectively. The increase in pH buffer capacity mainly due to the increased cations exchange capacity (CECs) after biochar application [49]. Meanwhile, the release of cations (K, Ca, Mg and Na) from biochar was the major cause of the increase in pH.…”
Section: Chemical Properties Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%