2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms coordinating ELAV/Hu mRNA regulons

Abstract: The 5’ and 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs) of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) function as platforms that can determine the fate of each mRNA individually and in aggregate. Multiple mRNAs that encode proteins that are functionally related often interact with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) that coordinate their expression in time and space as RNA regulons within the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) infrastructure we term the ribonome. Recent ribonomic methods have emerged that can determine which mRNAs are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
111
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
7
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The configuration of HuR-binding sites in CENPN exon 12, with two centrally located strong binding sites and additional (potentially weaker) binding sites along the exon (Supplementary Fig. 6), is consistent with the ability of HuR to cooperatively bind at multiple sites along RNA and to multimerize 44 , which could conceivably favour the recognition of this large ALE exon by various mechanisms. For example, it might bring closer the 3 0 -splice site and the polyA site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The configuration of HuR-binding sites in CENPN exon 12, with two centrally located strong binding sites and additional (potentially weaker) binding sites along the exon (Supplementary Fig. 6), is consistent with the ability of HuR to cooperatively bind at multiple sites along RNA and to multimerize 44 , which could conceivably favour the recognition of this large ALE exon by various mechanisms. For example, it might bring closer the 3 0 -splice site and the polyA site.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Unlike sRIP-seq, which only allows analysis of small RNAs (Ͻ35 nt), PAR-CLIP-seq can demonstrate binding to any RNA, regardless of length. The binding of AGO2 was compared to HuR, which has an affinity for AU-rich elements found within the 3= untranslated region of many mRNAs and tends to stabilize mRNAs, whereas AGO2 is a translational repressor (78). Meta-analysis of PAR-CLIP-seq signal across all tRNA genes showed strong enrichment for sense tRNA sequence compared to HuR (Fig.…”
Section: Human Argonaute 2 Binds To Actively Transcribed Trna Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common view is that HuR can globally repress the degradative/inhibitory effect of miRNAs on the target mRNAs, through a direct competition for the binding sites. Indeed, when binding sites for miRNAs and HuR are proximal, HuR (and probably other RBPs) can either block or displace the miRNP complex, allowing mRNA targets to be stabilized (for review, see Simone and Keene 2013). Still, there does not appear to be a single general mechanism by which HuR antagonizes miRNPs: For example, HuR has been shown to actually decrease mRNA stability and translation of c-myc mRNA by the recruiting of let-7 miR and RISC complex (Kim et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these sequences are known to be destabilizing for the RNAs that contain them, the binding of HuR and HuD increases the stability of the target mRNAs and sometimes activates their translation (Jain et al 1997). Thus, HuR protein appears to be one of the few RBPs found to stabilize ARE-and URE-containing mRNAs under most conditions (Simone and Keene 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%