Mechanisms and strategies for safe chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell activity control

Abstract

The clinical application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy has rapidly changed the treatment options for terminally ill patients with defined blood‐borne cancer types. However, CAR T‐cell therapy can lead to severe therapy‐associated toxicities including CAR‐related hematotoxicity, ON‐target OFF‐tumor toxicity, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Just as CAR T‐cell therapy has evolved regarding receptor design, gene transfer systems and production protocols, the management of side effects has also improved. However, because of measures taken to abrogate adverse events, CAR T‐cell viability and persistence might be impaired before complete remission can be achieved. This has fueled efforts for the development of extrinsic and intrinsic strategies for better control of CAR T‐cell activity. These approaches can mediate a reversible resting state or irreversible T‐cell elimination, depending on the route chosen. Control can be passive or active. By combination of CAR T‐cells with T‐cell inhibiting compounds, pharmacologic control, mostly independent of the CAR construct design used, can be achieved. Other strategies involve the genetic modification of T‐cells or further development of the CAR construct by integration of molecular ON/OFF switches such as suicide genes. Alternatively, CAR T‐cell activity can be regulated intracellularly through a self‐regulation function or extracellularly through titration of a CAR adaptor or of a priming small molecule. In this work, we review the current strategies and mechanisms to control activity of CAR T‐cells reversibly or irreversibly for preventing and for managing therapy‐associated toxicities.

Comparative performance of scFv-based anti-BCMA CAR formats for improved T cell therapy in multiple myeloma

“…While commercial scFv-based anti-BCMA CAR T cell products have achieved excellent clinical results in pivotal studies, therapeutic failure and relapse are still observed [ 6 ]. CAR T cell therapy has evolved in recent years due to continuous improvements in CAR vector design [ 7 , 8 ]. However, the optimal construction of an anti-BCMA CAR has yet to be defined.…”