Abstract:Despite the usually high abundance of iron (Fe) in soils, the low solubility of Fe-bearing minerals restricts the available Fe pools in most aerobic soils to levels that are far below those required for microbial or plant growth. To acquire the necessary amounts of Fe from the environment, organisms have evolved mechanisms that enhance the solubility and dissolution rate of Fe() oxyhydroxides prevailing in aerobic soils. Chemically, these mechanisms are based on weakening of the Fe$O bond by reductio… Show more
“…In many plant species, Fe deficiency also has a marked stimulatory effect on root hair production (Schmidt, 1999). This response is seen in dicots and in non-grass monocot species as part of a series of physiological and developmental adaptations that help to mobilise Fe in the soil (known as strategy I).…”
Section: Root Hair Length and Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This response is seen in dicots and in non-grass monocot species as part of a series of physiological and developmental adaptations that help to mobilise Fe in the soil (known as strategy I). Roots of the Poaceae (grasses) use a different strategy involving the secretion of phytosiderophores and subsequent uptake of the Fe(III)-phytosiderophore complex (strategy II) (Schmidt, 1999). Fe deficiency substantially increased both the length and number of root hairs in Arabidopsis, the response being seen within 24 h of transferring the seedlings to -Fe medium (Moog et al, 1995).…”
Section: Root Hair Length and Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is good evidence that Fe-deficiency responses in the root are controlled at least in part by shoot-derived signals (Schmidt, 1999), and it appears that the signal coming from the shoot is not Fe itself. The latter conclusion was based on grafting experiments using an Fe over-accumulating mutant (dgl) of pea which indicated that the dgl shoot was constitutively producing a signal compound of an unknown kind that was acting to stimulate Fe(III) reductase activity in the root (Grusak and Pezeshgi, 1996).…”
Section: Systemic Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A role for the non-protein amino acid nicotianamine (an efficient chelator of Fe(II) and Fe(III)) in sensing of internal Fe status has been hypothesized based on the Fe-overaccumulating phenotype of a nicotianamine-deficient tomato mutant (chloronerva) (Scholz et al, 1992). In addition, the root system of the recessive tomato mutant fer is unable to induce any of the characteristic responses to Fe deficiency (Bienfait, 1988;Ling et al, 1996) and the Fer gene product is thought to be a component of the Fe sensing or regulatory system responsible for induction of genes that mediate the Fe-deficiency responses (for a more detailed discussion of Fe sensing in plants and other organisms see Schmidt, 1999) Fig . 3B shows a generalized model for systemic regulation of developmental processes in the root by means of long distance signals from the shoot.…”
Root development is remarkably sensitive to variations in the supply and distribution of inorganic nutrients in the soil. Here we review examples of the ways in which nutrients such as N, P, K and Fe can affect developmental processes such as root branching, root hair production, root diameter, root growth angle, nodulation and proteoid root formation. The nutrient supply can affect root development either directly, as a result of changes in the external concentration of the nutrient, or indirectly through changes in the internal nutrient status of the plant. The direct pathway results in developmental responses that are localized to the part of the root exposed to the nutrient supply; the indirect pathway produces systemic responses and seems to depend on long-distance signals arising in the shoot. We propose the term 'trophomorphogenesis' to describe the changes in plant morphology that arise from variations in the availability or distribution of nutrients in the environment. We discuss what is currently known about the mechanisms of external and internal nutrient sensing, the possible nature of the long-distance signals and the role of hormones in the trophomorphogenic response.Abbreviations: ABA, abscisic acid; NR, nitrate reductase; P i , inorganic phosphate
“…In many plant species, Fe deficiency also has a marked stimulatory effect on root hair production (Schmidt, 1999). This response is seen in dicots and in non-grass monocot species as part of a series of physiological and developmental adaptations that help to mobilise Fe in the soil (known as strategy I).…”
Section: Root Hair Length and Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This response is seen in dicots and in non-grass monocot species as part of a series of physiological and developmental adaptations that help to mobilise Fe in the soil (known as strategy I). Roots of the Poaceae (grasses) use a different strategy involving the secretion of phytosiderophores and subsequent uptake of the Fe(III)-phytosiderophore complex (strategy II) (Schmidt, 1999). Fe deficiency substantially increased both the length and number of root hairs in Arabidopsis, the response being seen within 24 h of transferring the seedlings to -Fe medium (Moog et al, 1995).…”
Section: Root Hair Length and Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is good evidence that Fe-deficiency responses in the root are controlled at least in part by shoot-derived signals (Schmidt, 1999), and it appears that the signal coming from the shoot is not Fe itself. The latter conclusion was based on grafting experiments using an Fe over-accumulating mutant (dgl) of pea which indicated that the dgl shoot was constitutively producing a signal compound of an unknown kind that was acting to stimulate Fe(III) reductase activity in the root (Grusak and Pezeshgi, 1996).…”
Section: Systemic Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A role for the non-protein amino acid nicotianamine (an efficient chelator of Fe(II) and Fe(III)) in sensing of internal Fe status has been hypothesized based on the Fe-overaccumulating phenotype of a nicotianamine-deficient tomato mutant (chloronerva) (Scholz et al, 1992). In addition, the root system of the recessive tomato mutant fer is unable to induce any of the characteristic responses to Fe deficiency (Bienfait, 1988;Ling et al, 1996) and the Fer gene product is thought to be a component of the Fe sensing or regulatory system responsible for induction of genes that mediate the Fe-deficiency responses (for a more detailed discussion of Fe sensing in plants and other organisms see Schmidt, 1999) Fig . 3B shows a generalized model for systemic regulation of developmental processes in the root by means of long distance signals from the shoot.…”
Root development is remarkably sensitive to variations in the supply and distribution of inorganic nutrients in the soil. Here we review examples of the ways in which nutrients such as N, P, K and Fe can affect developmental processes such as root branching, root hair production, root diameter, root growth angle, nodulation and proteoid root formation. The nutrient supply can affect root development either directly, as a result of changes in the external concentration of the nutrient, or indirectly through changes in the internal nutrient status of the plant. The direct pathway results in developmental responses that are localized to the part of the root exposed to the nutrient supply; the indirect pathway produces systemic responses and seems to depend on long-distance signals arising in the shoot. We propose the term 'trophomorphogenesis' to describe the changes in plant morphology that arise from variations in the availability or distribution of nutrients in the environment. We discuss what is currently known about the mechanisms of external and internal nutrient sensing, the possible nature of the long-distance signals and the role of hormones in the trophomorphogenic response.Abbreviations: ABA, abscisic acid; NR, nitrate reductase; P i , inorganic phosphate
“…For example, several studies have shown the key role of organic acids in affecting plant tolerance to aluminum (Pellet et al 1995;Ma et al 2001). The role of organic acids in mediating the uptake of Fe 3+ was ascribed to ferric reductase activity and the presence of cation channels (Schmidt 1999). Compared to other metals, limited information exists on the interactions between organic acids and Pb at or near the soil-root interface, and the resultant processes of Pb uptake by plant roots.…”
The uptake and bioavailability of lead (Pb) in soil-plant systems remain poorly understood. This study indicates that acetic and malic acids enhance the uptake of Pb by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots under hydroponic conditions. The net concentration-dependent uptake influx of Pb in the presence and absence of organic acids was characterized by Michaelis-Menten type nonsaturating kinetic curves that could be resolved into linear and saturable components. Fitted maximum uptake rates (V max ) of the Michaelis-Menton saturable component in the presence of acetic and malic acids were, respectively, 2.45 and 1.63 times those of the control, while the Michaelis-Menten K m values of 5.5, 3.7 and 2.2 lM, respectively, remained unchanged. Enhanced Pb uptake by organic acids was partially mediated by Ca 2+ and K + channels, and also depended upon the physiological function of the plasma membrane P-type ATPase. Uptake may have been further enhanced by an effectively thinner unstirred layer of Pb adjacent to the roots, leading to more rapid diffusion towards roots. X-ray absorption spectroscopic studies provided evidence that the coordination environment of Pb in wheat roots was similar to that of Pb(CH 3 COO) 2 Á3H 2 O in that one Pb atom was coordinated to four oxygen atoms via the carboxylate group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.