1979
DOI: 10.2172/5997611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms and rates of atmospheric deposition of selected trace elements and sulfate to a deciduous forest watershed. [Roles of dry and wet deposition concentrations measured in Walker Branch Watershed]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amounts of tf inorganic N in forest gaps (3.5 kg ha -1 ), edges (3.4 kg ha -1 ) and closed forest plots (4.9 kg ha -1 ), July through September, were within range of annual tf fluxes for northern hardwood forests in upper Michigan (9.9 kg ha -1 year -1 ) (MacDonald et al 1992) and at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire (10.6 and 1.8 kg ha -1 for tf and incident precipitation, respectively) (Eaton et al 1973). There is a strong negative relation in tf concentrations with the amount of precipitation (e.g., Lindberg et al 1979). Total nutrient deposition, on the other hand, is positively related to precipitation amounts (Parker 1983).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amounts of tf inorganic N in forest gaps (3.5 kg ha -1 ), edges (3.4 kg ha -1 ) and closed forest plots (4.9 kg ha -1 ), July through September, were within range of annual tf fluxes for northern hardwood forests in upper Michigan (9.9 kg ha -1 year -1 ) (MacDonald et al 1992) and at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire (10.6 and 1.8 kg ha -1 for tf and incident precipitation, respectively) (Eaton et al 1973). There is a strong negative relation in tf concentrations with the amount of precipitation (e.g., Lindberg et al 1979). Total nutrient deposition, on the other hand, is positively related to precipitation amounts (Parker 1983).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wet deposition includes two processes: rainout, where the constituent is incorporated into droplets within the cloud; and washout, where the constituent is removed by falling precipitation below the cloud (Rodhe & Grandell 1972). Precipitation is usually regarded as the most important and efficient mechanism of particulate, aerosol, and gas removal from the atmosphere (Junge 1963), but exceptions can occur for some constituents (Lindberg et al 1979). The efficiency of these scavengng processes has been described and summarized by numerous investigators (US Energy Research andDevelopment Administration 1977, McMahon &Dennison 1979), and is related to constituent properties such as particle size, solubility, and chemical activity.…”
Section: Nitrogen Forms and Deposition Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incident precipitation is described as water that falls on the forest directly (Parker 1983). It is also referred to as gross fall (Lindberg et al 1979) and most times, the incident precipitation is oft en intercepted by the canopy (Kittredge 1948). Th roughfall refers to the precipitation which passes through the canopy and falls to the ground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%