Mechanism, stability and fitness cost of resistance to pyriproxyfen in the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Shah, Rizwan Mustafa; Shad, Sarfraz Ali; Abbas, Naeem

doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.02.003

Cited by 58 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Insect resistance to insecticides is often accompanied by fitness cost. It contributes to delaying the development of insecticide resistance in resistant strains [28]. The resistant insects show lower development rate, survival rate and fecundity than those of the susceptible individual [29].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Frequency detection of imidacloprid resistance allele in Aphis gossypii field populations by real-time PCR amplification of specific-allele (rtPASA)

Zhang

Cui

et al. 2015

Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Frequency detection of imidacloprid resistance allele in Aphis gossypii field populations by real-time PCR amplification of specific-allele (rtPASA)

Zhang

Cui

et al. 2015

Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Selection against resistance alleles can result when genetic changes that confer resistance negatively impact normal functions and impose a fitness cost in the absence of pesticides . Fitness costs can delay the development of resistance under certain conditions .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Resistance selection of indoxacarb in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): cross‐resistance, biochemical mechanisms and associated fitness costs

Cui

Wang

et al. 2018

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Fitness of an insect may be affected by environmental stress like insecticide selection pressure and leads to alteration of one or more life history parameters of the exposed species . Previously, a negative impact on the life history traits in resistant strains as compared to an unselected counterpart has been observed for pyriproxyfen resistance . Development of insecticide resistance may have a fitness cost due to the presence of resistance alleles in resistant species resulting in reduced fitness of those insects compared to the resistance alleles in an insect in an insecticide‐free environment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

House fly resistance to chlorantraniliprole: cross resistance patterns, stability and associated fitness costs

Shah

Shad

2019

Pest Management Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND The house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) is an important public health pest that serves as a carrier for pathogens transmitting various diseases of man and animals. It is well known for rapid resistance development to insecticides applied for its chemical control. Chlorantraniliprole, an anthranilic diamide, a ryanodine receptor agonist, is a promising agent for the integrated pest management of various insect pests. To design a retrospective resistance management strategy, life history traits of the chlorantraniliprole laboratory‐selected (CTPR‐SEL) and unselected counterpart (UNSEL) sub‐populations of a field strain and their reciprocal crosses were studied. RESULTS After eight generations of consecutive selection with chlorantraniliprole, a 750‐fold resistance level when compared to a susceptible strain and a 124‐fold resistance level when compared to the UNSEL strain had developed in CTPR‐SEL. Very low cross resistance to bifenthrin but no cross resistance to spinosad and fipronil was observed in the CTPR‐SEL strain. Results of the fitness traits suggest that the CTPR‐SEL has a lower relative fitness (0.34), reduced fecundity, a decrease in eggs hatchability, lower biotic potential and net reproductive rate as compared to the UNSEL strain. Interestingly, chlorantraniliprole resistance was unstable in the CTPR‐SEL. CONCLUSIONS Fitness costs associated with chlorantraniliprole resistance suggest that the efficacy of this insecticide could be preserved for a prolonged duration of time by alternating its use with insecticides having dissimilar modes of action and no cross resistance. When cross‐resistance is absent, a sequence of two insecticides is expected to be more durable than a mixture unless the population's h2 of resistance to the mixture is less than half of the mean of the population's h2 of resistance to the two individual components of the mixture. Unstable chlorantraniliprole resistance could also help to sustain its efficacy by being withdrawn from usage for some period of time. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

show abstract

Mechanism, stability and fitness cost of resistance to pyriproxyfen in the house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)

Cited by 58 publications

References 54 publications

Frequency detection of imidacloprid resistance allele in Aphis gossypii field populations by real-time PCR amplification of specific-allele (rtPASA)

Frequency detection of imidacloprid resistance allele in Aphis gossypii field populations by real-time PCR amplification of specific-allele (rtPASA)

Resistance selection of indoxacarb in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): cross‐resistance, biochemical mechanisms and associated fitness costs

House fly resistance to chlorantraniliprole: cross resistance patterns, stability and associated fitness costs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About