1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.24025.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism responsible for glucose–lactose diauxie in Escherichia coli: challenge to the cAMP model

Abstract: Background : The inhibition of¯-galactosidase expression in glucose-lactose diauxie is a typical example of the glucose effect in Escherichia coli. It is generally believed that glucose exerts its effect at least partly by reducing the intracellular cAMP level. However, there is no direct evidence that the inhibitory effect of glucose on the expression of the lac operon is mediated by a reduction of the cAMP level in the glucose-lactose system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
173
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(36 reference statements)
7
173
2
Order By: Relevance
“…the LacY permease activity occurs when the PTS component and signal-transduction protein EIIA glc is present in its unphosphorylated state and binds to LacY (20). This occurs when the cell is grown in the presence of PTS sugars, such as glucose, and, to lesser extents, when the cell is grown in the presence of other substrates that exert catabolite repression (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the LacY permease activity occurs when the PTS component and signal-transduction protein EIIA glc is present in its unphosphorylated state and binds to LacY (20). This occurs when the cell is grown in the presence of PTS sugars, such as glucose, and, to lesser extents, when the cell is grown in the presence of other substrates that exert catabolite repression (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This control mechanism is redundant and does not seem to add any significant effect with regards to the question asked here (Chu and Barnes, 2016). Moreover, there is experimental evidence (Inada et al, 1996;Bettenbrock et al, 2006;Görke and Stülke, 2008) suggesting that the repression of the metabolic genes in E.coli is of secondary importance for diauxic growth. Therefore and for reasons of model parsimony we will concentrate exclusively on direct inducer exclusion here.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Diauxic growth and the network that controls it has since been subject to intense experimental (Stülke and Hillen, 1999;Brückner and Titgemeyer, 2002;Boulineau et al, 2013;Boianelli et al, 2012;Inada et al, 1996;Kompala et al, 1986;New et al, 2014) and theoretical (Boianelli et al, 2012;Narang, 2006;Narang and Pilyugin, 2007;Kremling et al, 2009) investigation. There are two main mechanisms responsible for two phase growth in bacteria, both of which depend on the phosphotransferase (PTS) system (Deutscher, 2008): (i Regulation of metabolic genes via global transcription regulators, especially cAMP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, xylose metabolism was completely inhibited when glucose concentration exceeds 40% of the total sugars (49). Further, there is a strong debate on which of the cAMP-CRP complex or the inducer exclusion by glucose PTS is the major determinant of CCR in E. coli (6,12,62). Despite these complexities and disputes, several catabolite derepressed strains of E. coli have been constructed.…”
Section: Escherichia Colimentioning
confidence: 99%