Mechanism of Uneven Thermal Distribution Formation during Water Cooling at Low Temperature for a Moving Plate

Shoji, Naruhito; Hariki, Michiharu; Haraguchi, Yoichi; Morita, Masataka

doi:10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.86.6_381

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the thickness of the oxide scale is inhomogeneous, which causes a non-uniformity in the steel cooling rate. For example, Shoji et al 2) have reported that thicker oxide scales are prone to give higher water quench points (the transition temperature from film to nucleate boiling). This suggests that portions having thicker oxide scales cool faster at higher temperatures because the heat extraction due to nucleate boiling is one order of magnitude greater than that due to film boiling.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Temperature Dependence of Thermal Diffusivity and Conductivity of FeO Scale Produced on Iron by Thermal Oxidation

Endo

Akoshima³

et al. 2017

ISIJ International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The thermal diffusivity/conductivity of FeO scales produced on iron substrates by thermal oxidation have been determined as functions of temperature. Iron plates (99.99%) were oxidised at 973 K in air to obtain oxide scales of FeO, Fe 3 O 4 , and Fe 2 O 3 , and then were reduced at 1 273 K in nitrogen to obtain FeO-only. The densities of these scales were 5.85-6.05 g cm − 3 . The laser flash method was used to measure the apparent thermal diffusivity of the whole sample from room temperature to 1 164 K during the heating/ cooling cycles. This was converted to the thermal diffusivity of the scale only, which in turn was converted to the thermal conductivity. However, these values depended on the scale thickness, which suggests an interfacial heat resistance occurs between the scale layer and iron substrate. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations revealed that the scales contained Fe and Fe 3 O 4 phases after heating. The scale thermal diffusivity/conductivity were corrected considering the interfacial heat resistance and dispersed phases to derive the corresponding values for FeO only. The interfacial heat resistance derived from the thickness dependence of the scale thermal conductivity was 8.3 × 10 − 6 m 2 K W − 1 . Using this value, the thermal diffusivity of FeO was derived as 3.7 × 10 − 7 -5.8 × 10 − 7 m 2 s − 1 and the thermal conductivity as 1.8-2.5 W m − 1 K − 1 between room temperature and 1 164 K. The temperature coefficients of the thermal conductivity were mostly negative, which would be dominated by the phonon mean free path.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%