The electrooxidation of ethanol has been widely studied since its possible application in PEM cells. Many efforts have been devoted to disentangle its oxidation mechanism and how this mechanism depends on the ethanol concentration and the surface structure and composition of the electrode. [1][2][3][4] The goal is to obtain CO2 as final product at the lowest potential and the highest current. In the oxidation mechanism, three different products can be obtained: acetaldehyde, acetic acid and CO2, exchanging 2, 4 and 12 electrons respectively. Acetic acid is a stable product since its oxidation takes place at very high potentials [5] , thus the challenge is to break the C-C bond either in ethanol [6,7] or acetaldehyde [8] to obtain CO2.Among pure metals, platinum has the highest catalytic activity in acid media, but the final product in the oxidation is mixture of CO2 and acetic acid, whose ratio strongly depends on the surface structure. [9] In order to increase the activity of platinum, other metals, namely, Ru, [8,10] Os, [11,12] Sn [7] and Rh [13] have been added to the surface to diminish the overpotentials and to increase the selectivity of the oxidation towards the formation of CO2. The effect of these metals in the oxidation mechanism has been explained on the basis of the bifunctional mechanism [14] and ligand effect. [15] From previous results, it seems clear that the only surface modifier that increases the CO2/acetaldehyde ratio is Rh, [13] although the overall reaction rate is lower. On the other hand, the opposite combination, Pt deposited on Rh electrodes has not been studied yet. Rh electrodes are not active for the oxidation of ethanol. However, it has been shown that a single layer (or submonolayer) of a metal deposited on a different substrate can have electrocatalytic activities larger than any of the two bulk metals. [16,17] In general, the metal overlayer has interatomic distances that are different from the bulk metal, since it accommodates its structure to that of the underneath substrate. This effect causes a change in the electronic properties of the overalyer and can increase (or decrease) the catalytic properties.[18] The aim of this work is to determine the electrochemical behaviour of Rh electrodes modified by Pt (sub)monolayers for ethanol oxidation, analysing the effect of the surface composition on the mechanism using in situ FTIR spectroscopy. [19] For the clean Rh(111) electrode, the voltammogram in sulphuric acid solution shows a pair of quasi-reversible peaks at 0.15 and 0.06 V, which are associated to the competitive adsorption of hydrogen/sulphate on the electrode surface. [20,21] In the initial deposition stages of Pt, these peaks become significantly sharper and more reversible. Although the explanation on the origin of such change is beyond the scope of this manuscript, it should be recalled that the interaction of water with adsorbates is different on platinum and rhodium. For instance water and CO adsorbed on Pt(111) show repulsive interactions whereas attractive interac...