2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(200001)55:1<109::aid-mrd15>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of the block to hybridization and selfing between the sympatric ascidiansCiona intestinalis andCiona savignyi

Abstract: The solitary ascidians Ciona intestinalis and Ciona savignyi co‐occur in southern California harbors, but no hybrids have been recognized in nature. Numerous differences in their egg morphology were detected. Homologous (normal outcross) fertilization yielded 96–99% cleavage, where autologous (self) fertilization showed 3% and heterologous (hybrid) fertilization showed 0–1%. Acid treatment (pH 3.2) removed the block to selfing (P < 0.0001) but not hybridization for both species. Heterologous sperm bind to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…does not allow inferences on the gamete bias observed between the two sibling taxa. Studies of one-way cross-infertility in C. intestinalis support the notion that a multilocus mechanism controls sexual interactions (18,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…does not allow inferences on the gamete bias observed between the two sibling taxa. Studies of one-way cross-infertility in C. intestinalis support the notion that a multilocus mechanism controls sexual interactions (18,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…birds 66 . This is puzzling since developmental features, body plan, effective population size and environment are very similar, and even hybrids can be generated to the tadpole stage 67 . However, C .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterozygote deficiency at nine of our sites ( F IS values significantly greater than zero; Table ) could reflect either selection against heterozygotes or non‐random mating. We can reject selection against heterozygotes as we excluded loci putatively under selection, and we can also exclude selfing as self‐fertilization success is generally low in C. intestinalis (Bouchemousse, Lévêque, Dubois, & Viard, ; Byrd & Lambert, ). A more likely explanation is a Wahlund effect (Wahlund, ), a reduction of expected heterozygosity due to mixing of two genetically differentiated populations, which has been reported in other studies (Dupont, Viard, Dowell, Wood, & Bishop, ; Marescaux et al, ) including studies of Ciona spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%