2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of surface modification using machine hammer peening technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are higher in orthogonal direction to the tool path than parallel to it [5]. Moreover, it is obvious that the smaller the distance of indentation and stepover distance as well as the lower the feed rate are chosen, the more overlap and therefore higher energy is induced [6].…”
Section: Machine Hammer Peeningmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are higher in orthogonal direction to the tool path than parallel to it [5]. Moreover, it is obvious that the smaller the distance of indentation and stepover distance as well as the lower the feed rate are chosen, the more overlap and therefore higher energy is induced [6].…”
Section: Machine Hammer Peeningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous works like [4], [5] have shown that due to the preceding MHP-treatment on metallic materials, significant residual compressive stresses have been detected in the near-surface layers of the covered areas. These are higher in orthogonal direction to the tool path than parallel to it [5].…”
Section: Machine Hammer Peeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect of unstable feed rate during MHP-machining As well as looking at the influence of the feed rate on the processing results, additionally the dynamic behaviour of the robot system while machining was investigated. As presented by Bleicher in [6], the velocity and therefore the kinetic energy of the impact are dependent on the stroke of the hammer tip. For this purpose, the distance between the robot flange, where the electromagnetic system is mounted, and the treated surface was measured using a non-contact eddy current displacement sensor.…”
Section: Dynamic Behaviour Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the results show, the stiffness values of the combined system, are below 1,1 N/碌m for both, with and without MHP-actuator. As presented in [6], the occurring forces of the electromagnetic actuator are depending on the MHP-parameters I, f, h, where I is the intensity of the system, which is proportional to the current, f is the working frequency of the system and the so called stroke h represents the distance between the hammer tip and the treated surface. A consequence of the low stiffness of the robot and the acting process forces of the electromagnetic system is an increase of the distance between the tip and the surface.…”
Section: Static Behavior Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hammering quality will differ when it's treated manual and by automated, due to this process the strain hardening and tribological characteristics is increased [9,10]. Also, the surface of the metal by induction of compressive residual stress using actuators provides hardness improvement of the upper surface of layer and reduction of surface roughness up to mirror-like surfaces [11]. Burnishing and hammer peening also provides an improvement of the surface layer, an important factor of failure is the crack initiation by defects so the defects can be controlled by the burnishing [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%