The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1993
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of superconductivity in K3C60.

Abstract: Using electronic states and phonon states from the first-principles calculations and including both conventional electron-phonon charge coupling and Jahn-Teller coupling, we predict Tc and other superconducting properties.The only adjustable parameter in the theory is the screening length, R. Using Rsc = 0.8-1.0 A, we rind excellent agreement with experiment for Tc (16-18 K)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent past, the concept of metal doping has also been discussed for molecular compounds, in so-called endohedral clusters, such as metallofullerenes . Alkali metals as well as lanthanide ions inserted into the crystal structure or encapsulated inside carbon cages, respectively, caused significant changes in chemical and physical properties, such as metallic or superconducting characteristics for solid state M x C 60 (M = K, x = 3) and different magnetic properties for Ln@C 82 (Ln = La, Eu, Gd), upon variation of the interstitial lanthanide ion …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent past, the concept of metal doping has also been discussed for molecular compounds, in so-called endohedral clusters, such as metallofullerenes . Alkali metals as well as lanthanide ions inserted into the crystal structure or encapsulated inside carbon cages, respectively, caused significant changes in chemical and physical properties, such as metallic or superconducting characteristics for solid state M x C 60 (M = K, x = 3) and different magnetic properties for Ln@C 82 (Ln = La, Eu, Gd), upon variation of the interstitial lanthanide ion …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…exp(− H/T ) denotes averaging procedure where Ξ is a partition function. The effective Hamiltonian (12) does not account Coulomb correlations between electrons on neighboring sites, therefore to study conduction or insulation of the material we should proceed from the full Hamiltonian (1). The on-site Coulomb repulsions U, U , the on-site exchange interaction energy J and the Coulomb repulsion between neighboring sites V determine the change of energy at transfer of an electron from a site to a nearby site.…”
Section: Local Pairingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive correlation between T c and the lattice constant found in K-and Rb-doped fullerides has been understood in terms of the standard BCS theory: the density of states of conduction electrons is ν ∝ 1/W , and T c = 1.14 ω exp(−1/λν), thus the smaller W the large T c . Therefore superconductivity of A 3 C 60 is often described with Eliashberg theory in terms of electron-phonon coupling and Tolmachev's pseudopotential µ * [11][12][13]. In the same time there is another approach to describe phases of alkali-doped fulleride -the model of local pairing [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental evidence [5][6][7][8][9][10], supported by numerous phonon calculations [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], indicates that some of the intraball phonon modes are very high in energy and sufficiently strongly coupled to the electrons to account for these high T c s. Most of the phonon calculations assume that the Coulomb repulsion between the electrons comprising a pair are small, as they are in a usual metallic superconductor. (Effective Coulomb interactions are typically parameterized by a dimensionless number µ * = N(E F )U * [19], where N(E F ) is the density of states at the Fermi Surface (FS) and U * is an effective interaction matrix element between electrons at the FS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%