1995
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(94)01273-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of sulfur emission quenching in flame photometric detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disadvantages of the FPD include its nonlinear (exponential) response (to sulfur compounds) and compound-specific response characteristics. Its application in the determination of sulfur-containing compounds is also biased by the sulfur emission quenching of coeluting nonsulfur organic compounds ( and references therein). The pulsed flame photometric detector (PFPD), characterized by the addition of time dependence information of pulsed flame emission, has shown certain advantages over the FPD ( and references therein).…”
Section: Comparison Of Analytical Performance Among Different Gc-base...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disadvantages of the FPD include its nonlinear (exponential) response (to sulfur compounds) and compound-specific response characteristics. Its application in the determination of sulfur-containing compounds is also biased by the sulfur emission quenching of coeluting nonsulfur organic compounds ( and references therein). The pulsed flame photometric detector (PFPD), characterized by the addition of time dependence information of pulsed flame emission, has shown certain advantages over the FPD ( and references therein).…”
Section: Comparison Of Analytical Performance Among Different Gc-base...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps most seriously, analyte chemiluminescence in the FPD is severely quenched in the presence of even moderate amounts of coeluting hydrocarbons. As such, this can greatly complicate the analysis of complex samples, since the complete separation of analytes from all matrix components is often impractical. Although the mechanism for this response quenching is still not fully established, several possibilities have been suggested. Nonetheless, the resulting FPD signal erosion observed can present serious problems for the analyst.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the various kindred FPD devices reported over the years, occasionally those based upon unconventional combustion dynamics, such as the pulsed-FPD , and the reactive flow detector, have been demonstrated to reduce the impact of hydrocarbon quenching. Perhaps the most widely investigated device in this regard is the dual flame FPD (dFPD), which is based upon two flames placed in series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One group of materials that should be considered is fuels such as kerosene, diesel, and gasoline. , Fuels contain a variety of hydrocarbons that potentially coelute with target analytes and quench emission from the light-emitting species (S 2 * and POH*). Quenching of the emission from OS, OP, and other compounds has been studied in the past in conventional FPD , and also in μcc-FPD (using oxygen). , Fuels also contain OS compounds; as a result, false positive alarms are also a concern . Figure shows a chromatogram obtained with a narrow-bore column coupled to the miniature μcc-FPD when injecting 0.14−0.6 ng of OP and 48 ng of BT together with 7000 ng of gasoline.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%