bDuring viral infection or cellular stress, cap-dependent translation is shut down. Proteins that are synthesized under these conditions use alternative mechanisms to initiate translation. This study demonstrates that at least two alternative translation initiation routes, internal ribosome entry site (IRES) initiation and ribosome shunting, rely on ribosomal protein S25 (RPS25). This suggests that they share a mechanism for initiation that is not employed by cap-dependent translation, since cap-dependent translation is not affected by the loss of RPS25. Furthermore, we demonstrate that viruses that utilize an IRES or a ribosome shunt, such as hepatitis C virus, poliovirus, or adenovirus, have impaired amplification in cells depleted of RPS25. In contrast, viral amplification of a virus that relies solely on cap-dependent translation, herpes simplex virus, is not hindered. We present a model that explains how RPS25 can be a nexus for multiple alternative translation initiation pathways.T he predominant translation initiation pathway for cellular mRNAs is cap dependent, which requires recognition of the mRNA 5= cap structure by the cap binding protein eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E). eIF4E interacts with a complex of eukaryotic initiation factors to recruit the ribosome to the 5= end of the mRNA (1). However, some viral and cellular mRNAs contain an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) in their 5= untranslated region (UTR) that recruits the ribosome in a cap-independent manner. This allows translation of key regulatory proteins under conditions where cap-dependent translation is downregulated, such as during cell stress (2). In fact, 5 to 10% of cellular mRNAs have been predicted to contain IRES elements. IRESs are enriched in genes that encode proteins regulating growth, differentiation, and responses to stress (3, 4). Viruses have coopted this pathway by inhibiting cap-dependent translation and using an IRES to recruit host ribosomes to synthesize viral proteins (5).The mechanism of IRES-mediated translation is not well understood; however, our best understanding has come from studying viral IRESs. Viral IRESs have been characterized functionally according to the type and number of initiation factors required (6). The picornaviral IRESs require several canonical initiation factors and noncanonical IRES trans-acting factors (ITAFs) (6, 7). The hepatitis C virus (HCV) IRES can bind directly to the 40S ribosomal subunit but requires additional factors to initiate protein synthesis (8-10). The most streamlined IRESs are found in the intergenic region (IGR) of the Dicistroviridae virus family; they recruit the 40S and 60S subunits to form functional 80S complexes in the absence of any initiation factors (11-13).The IGR IRES binds to the intersubunit surface of the 40S subunit and occupies the peptidyl (P) and exit (E) sites, whereas the HCV IRES binds to the solvent side of the 40S subunit with only the finger-like domain IIb occupying the E site (14-16). While the binding of these two IRESs to the 40S subuni...