1999
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.84.2.210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Nitric Oxide–Induced Vasodilatation

Abstract: Abstract-The precise mechanisms by which nitric oxide (NO) decreases free [Ca 2ϩ ] i , inhibits Ca 2ϩ influx, and relaxes vascular smooth muscle are poorly understood. In rabbit and mouse aorta, agonist-induced contractions and increases in [Ca 2ϩ ] i were resistant to nifedipine, suggesting Ca 2ϩ entry through non-L-type Ca 2ϩ channels. Relaxations to NO were inhibited by thapsigargin (TG) or cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) indicating the involvement of sarcoplasmic reticulum ATPase (SERCA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
59
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because there was no effect on IP 3 levels, the possibility that NO may regulate either the intracellular response to IP 3 or processes of Ca 2ϩ influx and reuptake should be considered. In smooth muscle cells, NO was recently shown to influence the uptake of Ca 2ϩ by its effect on sarcoplasmic reticulum ATPase (25). It is noted that concentrations of Ang II (10 Ϫ8 M) that produce submaximal increases in IP 3 levels at the time point we used (20 s) did produce a maximal response with regard to ERK activation (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Because there was no effect on IP 3 levels, the possibility that NO may regulate either the intracellular response to IP 3 or processes of Ca 2ϩ influx and reuptake should be considered. In smooth muscle cells, NO was recently shown to influence the uptake of Ca 2ϩ by its effect on sarcoplasmic reticulum ATPase (25). It is noted that concentrations of Ang II (10 Ϫ8 M) that produce submaximal increases in IP 3 levels at the time point we used (20 s) did produce a maximal response with regard to ERK activation (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Cells-Primary culture SMC from mouse (mSMC) and rabbit (rSMC) aorta were prepared as described previously (10,25). Human platelets were prepared from the platelet-rich plasma as described previously (26).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative I/V relationships are shown during ramp depolarization after 10 min of cell dialysis. Passive leakage current with zero reversal potential (at the moment of breaking into the cell) was subtracted (it was usually higher in cells pretreated with BEL for 30 min and did not change over time (10,11,25). For summary data, ⌬ratio was calculated as the difference between the peak ratio after extracellular Ca 2ϩ was added, and its level right before Ca 2ϩ addition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NO attenuates IICR at several steps, by inhibiting G-protein in VSMCs (21) and platelets (22), by inhibiting phospholipase ␤ in PC12 cells (23), and by inhibiting IP 3 receptors in VSMCs (24). The effects of NO on CCE vary among cell types (19,20,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30); NO potentiates CCE in pancreatic acinar cells (25)(26)(27) and colonic epithelial cells (28), does not affect CCE in Jurkat T-lymphocytes (29) and embryonic kidney cells (30), and inhibits CCE in platelets (31) and VSMCs (32). Regarding the effects on Ca 2ϩ i sequestration, NO potentiates PMCA (33,34), NCX (35)(36)(37), and SERCA (32) in VSMCs, platelets, and astrocytes.…”
Section: Elevation No Also Potentiated Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of NO on CCE vary among cell types (19,20,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30); NO potentiates CCE in pancreatic acinar cells (25)(26)(27) and colonic epithelial cells (28), does not affect CCE in Jurkat T-lymphocytes (29) and embryonic kidney cells (30), and inhibits CCE in platelets (31) and VSMCs (32). Regarding the effects on Ca 2ϩ i sequestration, NO potentiates PMCA (33,34), NCX (35)(36)(37), and SERCA (32) in VSMCs, platelets, and astrocytes. However, in ECs, the effect of NO on Ca homeostasis varied among NO donor, NO gas, and endogenous NO, even in the same cell type (19,20,34,38,39).…”
Section: Elevation No Also Potentiated Camentioning
confidence: 99%