2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b02218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Membrane Poration by Shock Wave Induced Nanobubble Collapse: A Molecular Dynamics Study

Abstract: We performed coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations in order to understand the mechanism of membrane poration by shock wave induced nanobubble collapse. Pressure profiles obtained from the simulations show that the shock wave initially hits the membrane and is followed by a nanojet produced by the nanobubble collapse. While in the absence of the nanobubble, the shock wave with an impulse of up to 18 mPa s does not create a pore in the membrane, in the presence of a nanobubble even a smaller impulse lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
71
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(83 reference statements)
11
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 A, B, and F). The critical pressure impulse above which sonoporation occurred, for example at 1 MHz, can be estimated as J ≈ τ thresh · t = 1.45 · 10 −2 Pa · s. This is consistent with recent studies investigating cell membrane perforation induced by ultrasound shock waves (approximately megapascal range) applied over nanosecond timescales, which determined critical pressure impulses on the order of 10 −3 -10 −1 Pa · s when bubbles are present (17,18). In addition to the short timescales, the shear stress is limited to a small area of contact with the adjacent cell.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…4 A, B, and F). The critical pressure impulse above which sonoporation occurred, for example at 1 MHz, can be estimated as J ≈ τ thresh · t = 1.45 · 10 −2 Pa · s. This is consistent with recent studies investigating cell membrane perforation induced by ultrasound shock waves (approximately megapascal range) applied over nanosecond timescales, which determined critical pressure impulses on the order of 10 −3 -10 −1 Pa · s when bubbles are present (17,18). In addition to the short timescales, the shear stress is limited to a small area of contact with the adjacent cell.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2. The mechanism of bubble collapse agrees well with many existing simulation studies 2325, 30, 31, 55, 56, 60 . It can be inferred from Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To investigate these issues, we used reactive molecular dynamics simulation (reaxFF potential) 49, 50 to model the events occurring at the nanometer scale and sub-nanosecond time frame. While conventional molecular dynamics simulation can capture events like bubble ripening 5153 and collapse 23, 24, 30, 31, 5458 in homogenous fluids, the use of reactive molecular dynamics is essential to the assessment of PNN damage because of PNN’s heterogeneous morphology. The simulation results demonstrate the possible shock-induced damage mechanisms of HA due to bubble collapse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final large-sized unit cell (in some cases containing a bubble, in some without a bubble, to be able to study the effect of a bubble collapse on the integrity of the TJ by comparing results from simulations with and without the bubble collapse) was again equilibrated for another 10 ns and after this equilibration period our production runs with shock waves impinging on the system were performed. Shock waves were generated by using the momentum mirror approach which was successfully applied in previous simulation work where shock waves were created [26][27][28][34][35][36] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%