2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9nr03131f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of magnetic heating in Mn-doped magnetite nanoparticles and the role of intertwined structural and magnetic properties

Abstract: The heating efficiency of an assembly of Mn-doped magnetite nanoparticles can be tuned so as to depend linearly on the non-superparamagnetic fraction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, in the investigated samples the nanoparticles are not isolated, but they form large aggregates and even exhibit a tendency to coalesce, as observed in Figure 1. Therefore, the high values of T irr are consistent with the existence of magnetic interactions among the nanoparticles, resulting in an increase of their anisotropy energy barriers for magnetization reversal and shifting to higher temperature or preventing their entrance in the superparamagnetic regime [91,93,94]. In other words, one can consider that the nanoparticles are subjected to an effective magnetic anisotropy K eff higher than the anisotropy that operates when they are isolated.…”
Section: Squidmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actually, in the investigated samples the nanoparticles are not isolated, but they form large aggregates and even exhibit a tendency to coalesce, as observed in Figure 1. Therefore, the high values of T irr are consistent with the existence of magnetic interactions among the nanoparticles, resulting in an increase of their anisotropy energy barriers for magnetization reversal and shifting to higher temperature or preventing their entrance in the superparamagnetic regime [91,93,94]. In other words, one can consider that the nanoparticles are subjected to an effective magnetic anisotropy K eff higher than the anisotropy that operates when they are isolated.…”
Section: Squidmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The values of T irr are much higher than expected for non-interacting maghemite nanoparticles as small as the ones we are considering. In fact, assuming the Néel expression for the relaxation time of the magnetic moment of a nanoparticle [91] and in the adopted experimental conditions (in SQUID magnetometry, the measuring time is assumed equal to 100 s), the blocking temperature T B can be estimated using the relation T B = KV/25k B , where K= 5 × 10 4 erg/cm 3 [87] is the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of bulk maghemite and V is the particle volume [92,93]. For a nanoparticle of the sample Iolitec,~11 nm in size, T B~1 0 K is calculated and obviously lower values would be obtained for the P520 and P200 nanoparticles.…”
Section: Squidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 1, we report the values of coercivity H C and of the irreversibility field H irr . The latter parameter is the field at which the ascending and descending branches of the hysteresis loop join together, and it may be considered a measure of the anisotropy field of the system, i.e., H irr = 2 K eff /M S , where K eff is the effective anisotropy [56,57]. In order to calculate K eff from this relationship, M S must be expressed in (emu/cm 3 ); namely, the value of M S for MNP must be multiplied by the density of the Fe oxide phase, which we conventionally take to be 5 g/cm 3 , corresponding to the average of bulk Fe 3 O 4 and γ-Fe 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As formerly indicated by Dormann et al [ 39 ], dipolar magnetic interactions lead to an increase of the anisotropy energy barriers of the NPs. In the case of small and soft NPs, this effect improves the thermal stability of their magnetic moments, shifting to higher temperature or preventing the entrance in the superparamagnetic regime [ 39 , 129 , 149 , 173 , 174 , 175 , 176 ]. Under the conditions of validity of the LRT (i.e., in the linear regime), dipolar interactions can vary the Néel relaxation time τ N so as to approach the resonant condition f m τ N = 1 or move away from it, which leads to an increase or decrease of the hysteresis loop area, respectively; in the nonlinear regime, increasing τ N so as to pass from the superparamagnetic state (f m τ N < 1) to the blocked one (f m τ N > 1) increases more and more the hysteresis loop area, at least until demagnetizing effects become prevalent [ 172 ].…”
Section: Multicore Nanoparticles (Mc_nps)mentioning
confidence: 99%