While most distal human coronary arteries markedly relaxed in response to histamine, nearly half the proximal ones contracted only. Thus, we investigated the receptor mechanisms for those heterogeneous histamine actions. After a combination of cimetidine-treatment and endothelial removal, but neither one alone, proximal and distal rings contracted to histamine to the same degree. It is suggested that histamine hypercontractility in proximal human coronary artery is due to a lack of both direct (H2-receptor) and endothelial-mediated (H1-receptor) relaxant actions.human coronary artery ; histamine Proximal human coronary arteries have been reported to be more sensitive to histamine than distal ones (Ginsburg et al. 1984). On the other hand, histamine induces a reduction of coronary vascular resistance (Vigorito et al. 1986). Recently, three different histamine receptor mechanisms have been reported in the human coronary artery (Toda 1987). If these three components differ depending on the size of the coronary vessel, previously conflicting data are conceivable. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to investigate how responses of proximal arteries to histamine differ from those of distal ones and, if any, to clarify their histamine receptor mechanisms.Proximal (diameter of 3-5 mm) and distal (diameter of 1 mm) segments of right epicardial coronary arteries were isolated at autopsy from 28 noncardiac patients, and cut into 2.5 mm wide rings. For isometric tension recording (Shinkoh U-Gage, UL-20, Tokyo), each ring was suspended in a tissue bath filled with Krebs-Ringer solution saturated with 95% 02 and 5% CO2 at 3TC.. During a 90 min equilibration, the resting tension of proximal and distal rings was adjusted to 1.5 and 1.0 g, respectively. Histamine (10-8-10-4 M) was added in a cumulative fashion to the ring contracted with 50 mM KC1 under several interventions ; first in a control series, second, after treatment with 10-5 M pyrilamine, an H1-receptor antagonist, or 10-4 M cimetidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, or without endothelium, and third, a combination of the latter two.While almost all distal rings (53/57) relaxed markedly in response to histamine, proximal rings responded variously, ranging from relaxation to contraction. Proximal rings (40/83) which only contracted to histamine were used as hypercontracted arteries in