Similarities in the inhibition of crevice corrosion and pitting can be explained on the basis of competitive adsorption between inhibitive and aggressive ions. A mathematical model has been developed which takes into account competitive adsorption between aggressive ions (C1) and inhibitive ions (CrO4=), with each ion adsorbing according to a Temkin isotherm. In the case of crevice corrosion of iron, this model explains the linear relationship which has been observed between the logarithm of the chloride ion activity and the logarithm of the minimum chromate activity required for protection against crevice corrosion. In the case of pitting, this same model describes the linear decrease in pitting potential with the logarithm of the C1-activity at constant CrO4 = concentration. The mathematical model, in conjunction with electrochemical data and adsorption isotherms, allows calculation of a critical ratio, Ocrit, of surface coverages of aggressive to inhibitive ion necessary to initiate localized corrosion. This critical ratio was computed to be approximately the same value (1.9) for the crevice corrosion and pitting of iron in chromate/chloride solutions. Nominal confirmation for this computed value of Ocrit was provided by surface analyses using XPS.It is well established (1) that the various forms of localized corrosion share certain common features due to the limited exchange of local and bulk electrolytes. In crevice corrosion and stress corrosion cracking, for instance, the long narrow diffusion path limits access to the bulk electrolyte. In pitting corrosion, a porous cap of corrosion products can be the barrier. Based on these commonalities of restrictive geometry and resulting local acidity, Brown developed the concept that the various types of localized corrosion are different geometric manifestations of the same general phenomenon of "occluded cell corrosion" (2).The work of Br'own focused on similarities in the various forms of localized corrosion well into their propagation stages. There have been reports in the literature which suggest that crevice corrosion and pitting are also similar prior to the propagation stage. For instance, SzklarskaSmialowska and Mankowski (3) found that pits formed within crevices on stainless steel and suggested that "crevice corrosion can be considered as a particular case of pitting." Rosenfeld (4) suggested the converse, i.e., that "pitting corrosion on stainless steel should be regarded as a special kind of crevice corrosion .... "The present work shows that the inhibition of both crevice corrosion and pitting can be described by a competitive adsorption model in which aggressive ions (C1-) and inhibitive ions (CrO4 =) compete for sites on the metal surface. If the ratio of the surface coverages of aggressive to inhibitive ions exceeds a certain critical value, Oc~it, then breakdown of passivity occurs as crevice corrosion on shielded surfaces or as pitting on open surfaces. Corrosion experiments combined with adsorption isotherms show that Ocrit ~-1.9 and is the same ...