2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.122015999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of calcium/calmodulin inhibition of rod cyclic nucleotide-gated channels

Abstract: Rod cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels are heterotetramers comprised of both CNGA1 and CNGB1 subunits. Calcium͞calmod-ulin (Ca 2؉ ͞CaM) binds to a site in the N-terminal region of CNGB1 subunits and inhibits the opening conformational change in CNGA1͞CNGB1 channels. Here, we show that polypeptides derived from an N-terminal region of CNGB1 form a specific interaction with polypeptides derived from a C-terminal region of CNGA1 that is distal to the cyclic nucleotide-binding domain. Deletion of the Ca 2؉ ͞Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…39 The involvement of CaM in the NT-CT interaction also appears in other channels, such as CNG, where CaM binding to the NT disrupts the NT-CT interaction, leading to channel inactivation. 39,40 However, Ca 2C channels, unlike CNG or K C channels composed of 4 separate subunits (each with an NT and a CT), have only one NT and CT. The idea of an interaction between NT and CT in a 1C , and for a role of this interaction (within a hypothetical "NT-CT scaffold") 10 in channel gating and inactivation, has been already raised in the past.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 The involvement of CaM in the NT-CT interaction also appears in other channels, such as CNG, where CaM binding to the NT disrupts the NT-CT interaction, leading to channel inactivation. 39,40 However, Ca 2C channels, unlike CNG or K C channels composed of 4 separate subunits (each with an NT and a CT), have only one NT and CT. The idea of an interaction between NT and CT in a 1C , and for a role of this interaction (within a hypothetical "NT-CT scaffold") 10 in channel gating and inactivation, has been already raised in the past.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CaM-binding region in CNGA2 is an archetypal "1-8-14" site, characterized by hydrophobic residues at positions 1 and 14 and long chain aliphatic residues at position 8 (as underlined) (46). Rod CNGA1 subunits do not contain a Ca 2ϩ /CaM-binding site; however, CNGB1 subunits have an N-terminal site ( 682 LQELVKLFKERTEKVKEKLI 701 ) that is necessary for Ca 2ϩ / CaM binding (47)(48)(49). This site is critical for functional inhibition as its deletion in CNGB1 subunits results in heteromeric channels (after co-expression with CNGA1) that are insensitive to Ca 2ϩ /CaM (47)(48)(49).…”
Section: ؉ /Cam-binding Sites In the N-terminal Regions Of Cng Channmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rod CNGA1 subunits do not contain a Ca 2ϩ /CaM-binding site; however, CNGB1 subunits have an N-terminal site ( 682 LQELVKLFKERTEKVKEKLI 701 ) that is necessary for Ca 2ϩ / CaM binding (47)(48)(49). This site is critical for functional inhibition as its deletion in CNGB1 subunits results in heteromeric channels (after co-expression with CNGA1) that are insensitive to Ca 2ϩ /CaM (47)(48)(49). Several key residues (underlined) are similar to those in the IQ type of CaM binding motifs (IQXXXRGXXXRXX(F/W)); however, the CNGB1 region is "unconventional" as it lacks the central glycine, and the final hydrophobic residue is not amphipathic and requires Ca 2ϩ for CaM binding, unlike IQ motifs (46).…”
Section: ؉ /Cam-binding Sites In the N-terminal Regions Of Cng Channmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammalian CNGCs possess diverse sites for CaM binding, with at least nine CaMBDs found across both the N and C termini of the six different CNGC isoforms (Ungerer et al, 2011). However, to date, experiments have provided evidence of a functional role for only the N-terminal CaMBDs (Liu et al, 1994;Weitz et al, 1998;Trudeau and Zagotta, 2002;Zheng et al, 2003;Song et al, 2008), particularly the N-terminal LQ site of the regulatory CNGB1 subunit (Ungerer et al, 2011). Generally, CaM is hypothesized to function in the feedback regulation of CNGCs by binding to one or more CaMBD(s) at elevated cytosolic Ca 2+ levels and allosterically inhibiting CNGC conductance (Zheng et al, 2003;Zagotta, 2002, 2004;Bradley et al, 2001Bradley et al, , 2004Ungerer et al, 2011;Liu et al, 1994;Chen and Yau, 1994;Weitz et al, 1998;Song et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%