2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of bar displacement and corresponding bar fixation techniques in minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique included use of a stabilizer in the early period and then multipoint pericostal suture fixation since 2001. In 2007, we developed a new device, the claw fixator, which enables fixation of the pectus bar to the rib not by suturing but by hooking with a metal blade that prevents bar flipping (type 1 and 2 bar displacement) [10]. In 2009, we developed a hinge plate to prevent intercostal muscle stripping (type 3 bar displacement) [10] by supporting the hinge points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The technique included use of a stabilizer in the early period and then multipoint pericostal suture fixation since 2001. In 2007, we developed a new device, the claw fixator, which enables fixation of the pectus bar to the rib not by suturing but by hooking with a metal blade that prevents bar flipping (type 1 and 2 bar displacement) [10]. In 2009, we developed a hinge plate to prevent intercostal muscle stripping (type 3 bar displacement) [10] by supporting the hinge points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, we developed a new device, the claw fixator, which enables fixation of the pectus bar to the rib not by suturing but by hooking with a metal blade that prevents bar flipping (type 1 and 2 bar displacement) [10]. In 2009, we developed a hinge plate to prevent intercostal muscle stripping (type 3 bar displacement) [10] by supporting the hinge points. To compare the results of each fixation technique, patients were divided into four groups: a stabilizer group (STB, n ¼ 180); a multipoint pericostal suture fixation group (MPF, n ¼ 760), a claw fixator group (CFT, n ¼ 699); and a claw fixator plus hinge plate group (CFTþHP, n ¼ 177).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Failure or recurrence after primary MIRPE repair is generally due to technical issues and includes (2,(5)(6)(7)(8):…”
Section: Recurrence After Primary Mirpementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate stability is also impacted by the number of bars and balance of the chest wall on support structures. The pressure required to elevate the chest is significant and an inadequate number of bars to support the chest anterior can lead to lateral stripping of the intercostal and increased risk of bar rotation (8,10,12,13). Recommendations as to what is an adequate number of bars varies (2,(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Recurrence After Primary Mirpementioning
confidence: 99%