2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1471-4906(00)01801-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of anti-D-mediated immune suppression – a paradox awaiting resolution?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
108
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Presumably, epitope masking would also be fully operative in vitro, and an argument against its exclusive role is our finding that suppression in vitro is less efficient without Fc␥RIIB. In addition, some observations in the rhesus prophylaxis system are not easily explained by mere epitope masking (35). Doses of IgG anti-rhesus D, too low to cover all D Ags on human erythrocytes, suppressed the anti-D response (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Presumably, epitope masking would also be fully operative in vitro, and an argument against its exclusive role is our finding that suppression in vitro is less efficient without Fc␥RIIB. In addition, some observations in the rhesus prophylaxis system are not easily explained by mere epitope masking (35). Doses of IgG anti-rhesus D, too low to cover all D Ags on human erythrocytes, suppressed the anti-D response (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementmediated effects also appear unlikely because IgG, unable to activate C, is still able to suppress (30). A thorough discussion about possible explanations for the apparently paradoxical findings in the mouse vs the human system has recently been published (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in a murine model of ITP that IVIg changes the composition of Fcc receptors on the surface of monocytes; it downregulates the phagocytic-stimulatory FccRIIIa and upregulates the inhibitory FccRIIb [5]. Alternatively, it has been suggested that anti-D may cause immunosuppression by either interacting with receptors other than FccR or stimulating the production of immunosuppressive cytokines [6]. To examine the latter possibility, we designed a prospective anti-D dose cross-over study in 7 children with chronic AITP to compare the clinical ®ndings with in vivo serum cytokine/chemokine levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suppressive effect of IgG on the Ab response in the recipient has been termed Ab-mediated immune suppression (AMIS) 3 (2). The effectiveness of anti-D commonly exceeds that of the vaccine preparations, such as measles-mumpsrubella or diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-pertussis vaccines (3,4).…”
Section: Transfusion Of Igg-opsonized Foreign Red Blood Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%