Mechanism, Occasionalism and Final Causes in Johann Christoph Sturm’s Physics

Abstract

This paper argues that mechanism, occasionalism and finality (the acceptance of final causes) can be and were de facto integrated into a coherent system of natural philosophy by Johann Christoph Sturm (1635–1703). Previous scholarship has left the relation between these three elements understudied. According to Sturm, mechanism, occasionalism and finality can count as explanatorily useful elements of natural philosophy, and they might go some way to dealing with the problem of living beings. Occasionalism, in particular, serves a unifying ground: It will be shown that occasionalism can account for the problems of the source and transmission of motion that mechanism faces, while at the same time explaining the finality of non-rational living beings as designed by God.

Do you need to know in order to act? The case for a Suárezian legacy in early modern occasionalism

“…165-227). Occasionalist arguments often engage with issues pertaining to physics and natural philosophy (Lennon, 1974), and they are endorsed by authors who do not necessarily identify themselves as "Cartesians" (Henkel, 2021). The impact of occasionalist-inflected philosophies extended beyond the Franco-Dutch Cartesian network, including at least Great Britain (Connolly, 2021) and the German Empire (Henkel, 2022a) and remaining alive as an intellectual interlocutor until at least the mid-eighteenth century (Henkel, 2022b).…”