2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901894106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism for top-down control of working memory capacity

Abstract: Working memory capacity, the maximum number of items that we can transiently store in working memory, is a good predictor of our general cognitive abilities. Neural activity in both dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex has been associated with memory retention during visuospatial working memory tasks. The parietal cortex is thought to store the memories. However, the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a top-down control area, during pure information retention is debated, and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

24
319
2
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(363 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(79 reference statements)
24
319
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it will be critical for future studies to determine how to identify filtering-related activity in the absence of distractors, or how to better operationalize the activity observed during filtering. A potential candidate for such activity may be provided by a study that found a positive correlation between VWM capacity (which was measured both by behavioral performance and by the amount of BOLD signal observed in the IPS) and activity in the DLPFC (Edin et al, 2009). The authors of this study suggested that VWM capacity was partly determined by topdown control driven by activity originating in the DLPFC, even when distractors were not present.…”
Section: General Discussion: Does the Bouncer Need A Raise?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Consequently, it will be critical for future studies to determine how to identify filtering-related activity in the absence of distractors, or how to better operationalize the activity observed during filtering. A potential candidate for such activity may be provided by a study that found a positive correlation between VWM capacity (which was measured both by behavioral performance and by the amount of BOLD signal observed in the IPS) and activity in the DLPFC (Edin et al, 2009). The authors of this study suggested that VWM capacity was partly determined by topdown control driven by activity originating in the DLPFC, even when distractors were not present.…”
Section: General Discussion: Does the Bouncer Need A Raise?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…DLPFC has been associated with the encoding and retrieval phases of WM tasks (Balconi 2013), and consistent evidence implicates parietal areas in the actual storage of information (Edin et al 2009). DLPFC may regulate the signal-tonoise ratio of the parietal cortex to enable increased storage capacity (Edin et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DLPFC has been associated with the encoding and retrieval phases of WM tasks (Balconi 2013), and consistent evidence implicates parietal areas in the actual storage of information (Edin et al 2009). DLPFC may regulate the signal-tonoise ratio of the parietal cortex to enable increased storage capacity (Edin et al 2009). Prior electrophysiological studies have shown that high-frequency rTMS can entrain endogenous alpha frequency in the stimulated area, which then leads to suppression of distracters and thus enhancement of WM capacity (Sauseng et al 2009;Hamidi et al 2009;Thut and Miniussi 2009;Klimesch et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the working memory capacity of the whole network will increase in the same way as for selfexcitation. A similar idea was put forward by Edin et al (2009), who identified dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as a source of top-down modulatory signals to the parietal cortex.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Vwm Capacitymentioning
confidence: 85%