2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism-based models for topotecan-induced neutropenia

Abstract: This model can be used to describe both the duration and intensity of neutropenia; the area between the curve of neutrophil count versus time and a critical neutrophil count (such as 0.500 x 10(3) /mm 3 ) would be a better toxic endpoint than the unique observed value of neutrophil at nadir. The model may be used to predict neutropenia corresponding to regimens of topotecan not yet explored.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time course of the neutrophil counts after the administration of BI 2536 was adequately described by the semi-mechanistic model previously proposed by Friberg et al [9]. The estimates of the system related parameters (Circ 0 = 4.96 cells 9 10 9 /L, MTT = 4.45 days, and c = 0.161) and their IPV estimates were very similar to those reported during the last 7 years for a variety of different anticancer drugs on the market or in development: 4.46-5.81 9 10 9 cells/L for Circ 0 , 3.65-5.62 days for MTT and 0.119-0.23 for c [9,[12][13][14][17][18][19]. The model selected in the current analysis is well established and has shown consistency in the system related parameter across several studies involving different anti-cancer drugs [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The time course of the neutrophil counts after the administration of BI 2536 was adequately described by the semi-mechanistic model previously proposed by Friberg et al [9]. The estimates of the system related parameters (Circ 0 = 4.96 cells 9 10 9 /L, MTT = 4.45 days, and c = 0.161) and their IPV estimates were very similar to those reported during the last 7 years for a variety of different anticancer drugs on the market or in development: 4.46-5.81 9 10 9 cells/L for Circ 0 , 3.65-5.62 days for MTT and 0.119-0.23 for c [9,[12][13][14][17][18][19]. The model selected in the current analysis is well established and has shown consistency in the system related parameter across several studies involving different anti-cancer drugs [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The inter-patient variability of the slope parameter was high (65%) for BI 2536, however, the value was within the range reported for other anticancer drugs: 40-82% [9,12,14,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Absolute Neutrophil Count-time Profile Vpcmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to the system related parameters, the estimated of Circ 0 was consistent with ANC normal values. The MTT could not be estimated correctly with the available data and, therefore, was fixed to 118 h as previously reported in the literature (30,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48). The estimated γ value, 0.135, was also similar to those obtained previously for other anticancer drugs, such as irinotecan (0.132) or topotecan (0.120) (30,49).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This approach has been widely applied to various anticancer agents [10,[37][38][39] since it is simple in nature to operate with minimum number of parameters while accounting for the time delay for onset of responses and rebound phase typically observed in myelosuppression profiles. A similar approach has been also applied to chemotherapy-related thrombocytopenia [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%