1975
DOI: 10.1021/jo00892a021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism and stereochemistry of oxetane reactions. I. Stereospecific synthesis of the diastereoisomeric 2-phenyl-3-methyloxetanes and study of their configuration and conformation by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
8
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The H,H coupling constants between the 3‐ and 4‐methine protons were 7.1 Hz for δ = 4.95 and 5.46 ppm and 6.9 Hz and 7.0 Hz (averaged value is 7.0 Hz) for δ = 4.45 and 5.11 ppm. This confirmed that the former corresponded to the cis form and the latter to the trans form, because in 3‐methyl‐2‐phenyloxetanes the cis form has a larger coupling constant ( 3 J H,H = 8.1 Hz) than that ( 3 J H,H = 6.7 Hz) of the trans form, and the reported 1,2‐oxaphosphethanes have similar tendencies: that is, 3 J H,H = 7.5 Hz for the cis form and 3 J H,H = 5.9 Hz for the trans form . From these results, the two signals observed at δ = –57.3 and –55.2 ppm in the 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectra were assigned to cis ‐ and trans ‐1,2‐oxaphosphetanes 5a and 5b , respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The H,H coupling constants between the 3‐ and 4‐methine protons were 7.1 Hz for δ = 4.95 and 5.46 ppm and 6.9 Hz and 7.0 Hz (averaged value is 7.0 Hz) for δ = 4.45 and 5.11 ppm. This confirmed that the former corresponded to the cis form and the latter to the trans form, because in 3‐methyl‐2‐phenyloxetanes the cis form has a larger coupling constant ( 3 J H,H = 8.1 Hz) than that ( 3 J H,H = 6.7 Hz) of the trans form, and the reported 1,2‐oxaphosphethanes have similar tendencies: that is, 3 J H,H = 7.5 Hz for the cis form and 3 J H,H = 5.9 Hz for the trans form . From these results, the two signals observed at δ = –57.3 and –55.2 ppm in the 31 P{ 1 H} NMR spectra were assigned to cis ‐ and trans ‐1,2‐oxaphosphetanes 5a and 5b , respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Compound 4 was readily decomposed under the vpc conditions, but its purification was accomplished successfully by medium-pressure liquid chromatography followed by repeated vacuum distillations. The stereochemical assignment of l c , It, and 3c based on the 'H nmr data was in accordance with that deduced from the consequence of the ring closure process (5). The configurations of 2c, 2t, and 3t were assigned from the characteristics observed in the 'H nmr spectra: J2,,(cis) > J2 ,,(trans), tic2-,(cis) > tic2-,(trans), and tic3-,(cis) > tic3-,(trans).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…1981 reaction (6). Since the separation and purification of l c and It obtained in the photoreaction were troublesome, they were synthesized from erythro-and threo-2-methyl-1-phenyl-3-@-toluenesulfonyloxy)-1-propanols by following the reported procedures (5). The photoreaction of benzaldehyde with 3,3-dimethyl-1-butene gave a mixture rich in 3r.…”
Section: Oxetanesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optically active 3,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-oxetane (S)-( + )-3a has been synthesized previously by means of enantioselective reduction of 3-chloro-2,2-dimethyl-1-phenyl-1-propanone followed by ring closure. 33 In this work as well as that of Balsamo et al 15 it has been shown that the chiral center of starting substances (1,2-disubstituted 1,3-diols or 1,2-disubstituted 3-chloropropanols) is not involved in the ring closure and keeps its original configuration. The diols 1a, 1c and 1g in optically pure R and S forms were readily converted into the optically pure oxetanes (Figure 3) by the PTC procedure described above.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Application of PTC methods (quaternary ammonium salt, NaOH as base, CH 2 Cl 2 as solvent) led to the formation of 3a-i (Scheme 4) in the overall yields indicated in parentheses. Compound 3a has been reported in the literature 15 and was prepared in 82 % yield from the mesylate of 1a by treatment with KOBu-t in tert-butyl alcohol following the literature method. Attempts by us (entries 2 and 3 in Table 1) to use cheaper KOH in MeOH led to significantly poorer yields.…”
Section: Scheme 2 Schemementioning
confidence: 99%