1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00321217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism and kinetics of the reaction: 1 dolomite + 2 quartz = 1 diopside + 2 CO2: a comparison of rock-sample and of powder experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction of the fluid/solid ratios in a closed-capsule environment might slow the reaction rate by limiting the amount of reactants transported through the fluid, but Luttge and Metz (1993) could not observe any difference in the dissolutionprecipitation reaction mechanism for dolomite + quartz decarbonation with a fluid/solid ratio of 1 : 37 compared to an earlier study with a fluid/solid ratio of 1:4 (Luttge and Metz, 1991).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Reduction of the fluid/solid ratios in a closed-capsule environment might slow the reaction rate by limiting the amount of reactants transported through the fluid, but Luttge and Metz (1993) could not observe any difference in the dissolutionprecipitation reaction mechanism for dolomite + quartz decarbonation with a fluid/solid ratio of 1 : 37 compared to an earlier study with a fluid/solid ratio of 1:4 (Luttge and Metz, 1991).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Nucleation and precipitation rates may have strongly influenced the evolution of the fluid composition in both the inner capsule and the external tube in our experiments. Indeed, it is the balance between dissolution and crystallization rates that determines the shape of the reaction path (Lü ttge and Metz, 1991). However, the concentration oversteps required for nucleation (Petrov et al, 1969;Lü ttge and Metz, 1991) are not well known and may depend on parameters such as temperature, local energy variations or presence of impurities (e.g., heterogeneous nucleation on the gold tube), which were not modeled here.…”
Section: Dissolution Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, it is the balance between dissolution and crystallization rates that determines the shape of the reaction path (Lü ttge and Metz, 1991). However, the concentration oversteps required for nucleation (Petrov et al, 1969;Lü ttge and Metz, 1991) are not well known and may depend on parameters such as temperature, local energy variations or presence of impurities (e.g., heterogeneous nucleation on the gold tube), which were not modeled here. Growth rate constants for gibbsite (Nagy and Lasaga, 1992), kaolinite (Carroll and Walther, 1990;Nagy et al, 1991), and some other minerals are available in the literature.…”
Section: Dissolution Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The experimental design is similar to that of Lüttge and Metz (1993) in their study of dolomite + quartz stability. Small cores, approximately 4 mm in diameter and 5-7 mm in length, were drilled from each marble sample.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Laboratory studies of reaction rates are generally performed with the use of mineral powders to approximate rock assemblages (e.g., Dachs and Metz 1988;Heinrich et al 1986Heinrich et al , 1989Kase and Metz 1980;Kridelbaugh 1973;Lüttge and Metz 1991;Schramke et al 1987;Tanner et al 1985). Those studies were successful in describing mechanisms and rates of reactions, but the large porosities and surface areas of powders in direct contact with an abundant fl uid phase differ considerably from low-permeability rocks (Lüttge and Metz 1993). To investigate kinetic processes under more realistic conditions, we conducted an experimental study that used dolomitic marble as starting material to determine the reaction textures and rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%