2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-019-0411-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism and force-energy parameters of a hollow shaft’s multi-wedge synchrostep cross-wedge rolling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…require rolls with diameters exceeding 2 m. For this reason the possibility of rolling axles using several pairs of wedges simultaneously was investigated. [12][13][14] Such solution allows the tool to be significantly shorter and used in a rolling mill with the diameter of rolls about 1 500 mm (rolling mills with such rolls are already produced in China). Unfortunately employing the multi-wedge rolling scheme magnified the problem of excessive ovalisation of the cross-section.…”
Section: Conception Of a Three Roll Cross Rolling Process Of Hollow Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…require rolls with diameters exceeding 2 m. For this reason the possibility of rolling axles using several pairs of wedges simultaneously was investigated. [12][13][14] Such solution allows the tool to be significantly shorter and used in a rolling mill with the diameter of rolls about 1 500 mm (rolling mills with such rolls are already produced in China). Unfortunately employing the multi-wedge rolling scheme magnified the problem of excessive ovalisation of the cross-section.…”
Section: Conception Of a Three Roll Cross Rolling Process Of Hollow Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method the workpiece is simultaneously deformed by 2 or 3 sets of wedges, which means that the nominal diameter of the tools could be reduced to 1600 mm [1,7]. Results of the rolling tests performed in 1:5 scale by Peng et al [7] and Zheng et al [8] demonstrated that the production of rail car axles by the multi-wedge cross-rolling method is difficult due to significant inaccuracies in product shape and the problem with removing the ovalisation of the cross section of the product (in the case of hollow axles). According to Pater and Tomczak [9], an alternative to multi-wedge cross-rolling is a CWR process that is performed in two operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1600 mm [8,9], which is an implementable size. The experimental tests (1:5 scale models) indicated that the accuracy of the product manufactured using the multiwedge rolling method is unsatisfactory [8,13]. An effective elimination of the ovalization of the cross-section, typical for the two-roll method [1,10,11], poses a significant problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%