2012
DOI: 10.5754/hge12590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism and Efficacy of Mobilization of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatic Failure

Abstract: The basal levels of stem cell mobilization in patients with liver cirrhosis might be associated with the repair of liver injury. G-CSF could promote hematopoietic stem cell mobilization through regulation of the expression levels of stem-cell-mobilization-related factors in patients with liver cirrhosis. No apparent effects of G-CSF therapy on both liver function and short-term prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis were confirmed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…G-CSF can promote CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell mobilization through regulation of stem cells mobilization-related factors in patients with liver cirrhosis (34) and HBV-associated acute-on-chronic hepatic failure (35). In addition, a recent study revealed that G-CSF was significantly lower in patients with pulmonary embolism in comparison to controls (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G-CSF can promote CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell mobilization through regulation of stem cells mobilization-related factors in patients with liver cirrhosis (34) and HBV-associated acute-on-chronic hepatic failure (35). In addition, a recent study revealed that G-CSF was significantly lower in patients with pulmonary embolism in comparison to controls (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 11 In total, 42 of 94 G-CSF users died from multi-organ failure, whereas 74 of 98 G-CSF non-users died. The pooled analysis of the survival benefit represented an RR of 2.25 (95% CI 1.517 to 3.338, p = 0.000), with no substantial heterogeneity across studies (I 2 = 30.1%, p = 0.232).After excluding the study that applied case-control analysis of a cohort study, 10 the RR increased even further for patients with G-CSF therapy (RR = 2.682, 95% CI 1.732 to 4.151, p = 0.000), indicating no heterogeneity among studies (I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.666) ( Fig.6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Data on liver function parameters were available in three trials comparing G-CSF with control therapy. 10 , 11 No significant difference was found in prothrombin time (PT) between G-CSF and control therapy groups (OR = −0.064, 95% CI −0.481 to 0.353, p = 0.764). No substantial heterogeneity was detected (I 2 = 61.4%, p = 0.107) ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations