1997
DOI: 10.3109/17453679708996258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics of the anterior drawer and talar tilt tests: A cadaveric study of lateral ligament injuries of the ankle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
91
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L ateral ligament stress testing after an inversion ankle sprain is used to identify the presence of increased laxity within the talocrural and subtalar joints (ankle complex) when compared with the contralateral ankle. 1 This assessment commonly involves the anterior drawer and inversion tests [2][3][4] and is performed by applying an anteriorly directed force or inversion torque to the foot. 5 In the biomechanical literature, researchers [6][7][8] have shown the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is the major ligamentous structure preventing forward subluxation of the talus and the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) is the primary restraint of talar inversion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L ateral ligament stress testing after an inversion ankle sprain is used to identify the presence of increased laxity within the talocrural and subtalar joints (ankle complex) when compared with the contralateral ankle. 1 This assessment commonly involves the anterior drawer and inversion tests [2][3][4] and is performed by applying an anteriorly directed force or inversion torque to the foot. 5 In the biomechanical literature, researchers [6][7][8] have shown the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is the major ligamentous structure preventing forward subluxation of the talus and the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) is the primary restraint of talar inversion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anterior talar displacement or talar tilt angle is measured under stress loading. However, accuracy of these conventional stress tests is suspect [4][5][6][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Some limitations in the standard evaluation methods were because ankles were tested in various f dorsiflexion to a point at the peak of the motion curve positions and with different forces applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some limitations in the standard evaluation methods were because ankles were tested in various f dorsiflexion to a point at the peak of the motion curve positions and with different forces applied. Different authors recommended stressing the ankle in dorsiflexion, in the neutral position, or in plantarflexion during the stress manoeuvre [6,10,16,17]. The foot position affects ankle stability because the relationship between ligamentous laxity and bony constraints vary with flexion angle during stress testing [7,9,[18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…112 • Cadaver model: when tested at between 10° and 20° of plantar flexion, anterior talar translation with inversion and internal rotation forces produced the greatest amount of talar translation/ligament laxity. 13,92,122 The anterior drawer performed in 20° of plantar flexion was not able to differentiate between intact and sectioned anterior talofibular ligament or between intact and sectioned anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments. 93 The anterior drawer test that emphasized rotatory instability had a correlation of 0.93 to direct anatomical measurements.…”
Section: Anterior Drawermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,42,122,144 • Instrument variations: joint arthrometers, such as the LigMaster 66 and Telos, 165 have been developed to quantify the degree of talar tilt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%