2001
DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.24961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics of the antebrachial interosseous membrane: Response to shearing forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
15
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results are not comparable directly with those obtained in our study because we applied load along the direction of IOL fibers to isolated IOL constructs. In general the stiffness and strength measurements for the intact interosseous membrane reported by McGinley et al 16 and Wallace et al were higher than those we obtained for the intact IOL, likely because of the difference in loading mode and the fact that accessory bands would contribute additional stiffness and strength.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results are not comparable directly with those obtained in our study because we applied load along the direction of IOL fibers to isolated IOL constructs. In general the stiffness and strength measurements for the intact interosseous membrane reported by McGinley et al 16 and Wallace et al were higher than those we obtained for the intact IOL, likely because of the difference in loading mode and the fact that accessory bands would contribute additional stiffness and strength.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…20 Other studies have examined the tensile properties of the IOL. McGinley et al 16 reported on ultimate load and modulus of the entire interosseous membrane (IOL and accessory bands) loaded in a shearing mode with force applied along the axis of the radius and ulna oblique to the direction of IOL fibers. Wallace et al reported on stiffness and ultimate load for a similar testing configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its fiber orientation, the oblique cord is not likely to be involved in transferring force from the radius to the ulna during axial loading activities, contrary to reports of the interosseous membrane (Morris 1879;Schneiderman et al 1993;Birkbeck et al 1997;Skahen et al 1997;Markolf et al 1998;Pfaeffle et al 1999;McGinley et al 2001;Shepard et al 2001;Kaufmann et al 2002;but see Halls and Travill 1964). As the forearm is compressed and the radius is shifted proximally against the capitulum, the fibers of the interosseous membrane, which run from the radius proximally to the ulna distally, become taut and the load is shifted from the radius to the ulna through the membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The interosseous membrane of the forearm is most taut at the neutral position of the hand [5,18,28] and it plays a role in load transfer from the radius to the ulna during axial loading activities [15,25,27]. In contrast, because the fibre direction is at a right angle to the fibres in the interosseous membrane, the oblique cord is most taut during supination and is unlikely to play a role in axial load transfer from the radius to the ulna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%