2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics of the ankle and subtalar joints revealed through a 3D quasi-static stress MRI technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
67
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
67
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The eccentric cases simulated here covered reported extreme displacements of the mobile-bearing insert (Siegler et al, 2005;Reggiani et al, 2006;Leszko et al, 2008). The main limitation of the model was the use of non-fresh cadaveric bone, which were perfused and conserved 4 years in a formaldehyde solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eccentric cases simulated here covered reported extreme displacements of the mobile-bearing insert (Siegler et al, 2005;Reggiani et al, 2006;Leszko et al, 2008). The main limitation of the model was the use of non-fresh cadaveric bone, which were perfused and conserved 4 years in a formaldehyde solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Other investigators, using a variety of techniques, have studied ankle joint complex (AJC) kinematics both in vitro and in vivo. [8][9][10][11][12][13]18,19,[21][22][23][24][25] A direct comparison of results between techniques, however, is difficult because of differing test conditions and measurement Table 3. Range of Motion of the AJC, Talocrural, and Subtalar Joints during the Stance Phase of Walking Numbers in italics show significant difference between the motion of the talocrural and subtalar joints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19] These techniques offer three-dimensional (3D) quantification of in vivo morphology and positions of the AJC without using invasive markers. With these techniques however, the joint must be fixed in one position during CT or MR scanning, limiting the flexibility of the techniques to study various functional activities of the ankle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, since we had no information about the donor, we applied the same loading to all tibias, which is certainly not fully consistent with real life. The eccentric case simulated here covered reported extreme displacements of the mobile bearing (Siegler et al 2005;Reggiani et al 2006;Leszko et al 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%