2021
DOI: 10.1145/3450626.3459816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics-aware deformation of yarn pattern geometry

Abstract: Triangle mesh-based simulations are able to produce satisfying animations of knitted and woven cloth; however, they lack the rich geometric detail of yarn-level simulations. Naive texturing approaches do not consider yarn-level physics, while full yarn-level simulations may become prohibitively expensive for large garments. We propose a method to animate yarn-level cloth geometry on top of an underlying deforming mesh in a mechanics-aware fashion. Using triangle strains to interpolate precomputed yarn geometry… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from a three-dimensional parameterization of the jersey knit pattern [29] to curvature augmented model [30], followed by energy minimization model [31], most geometric models of knitted fabrics are constructed through superposition of cosine and sine curves due to the smoothness and periodicity of these shape functions. With the development of spline basis functions, we can discretize yarns with sufficient accuracy and such yarn-based models [32][33][34][35][36][37] have key advantages compared to coarse-grained models [38][39][40][41] and homogenized models [42][43][44][45][46], due to their capability to: (i) capture mechanical behaviour originating from first principles via yarn dynamics, (ii) provide quantitative measurements of geometric nonlinearity arising across scales, and (iii) vary the spatial distribution of stitch patterns and material properties of yarns to form targeted two-and three-dimensional configurations, all while not constraining the extensibility of individual yarn segments affinely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from a three-dimensional parameterization of the jersey knit pattern [29] to curvature augmented model [30], followed by energy minimization model [31], most geometric models of knitted fabrics are constructed through superposition of cosine and sine curves due to the smoothness and periodicity of these shape functions. With the development of spline basis functions, we can discretize yarns with sufficient accuracy and such yarn-based models [32][33][34][35][36][37] have key advantages compared to coarse-grained models [38][39][40][41] and homogenized models [42][43][44][45][46], due to their capability to: (i) capture mechanical behaviour originating from first principles via yarn dynamics, (ii) provide quantitative measurements of geometric nonlinearity arising across scales, and (iii) vary the spatial distribution of stitch patterns and material properties of yarns to form targeted two-and three-dimensional configurations, all while not constraining the extensibility of individual yarn segments affinely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sha et al 6 used the discretized Newton's method to analyze the gap between the dynamic knitwear-human body and the knitwear model, and then the knitwear model was further divided into different regions. Sperl et al 7 proposed a method to animate the yarn-level cloth geometry on top of an underlying deforming mesh in a mechanicsaware fashion. Using triangle strains to interpolate precomputed yarn geometry, they are able to reproduce effects such as knit loops tightening under stretching.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sperl et al. 7 proposed a method to animate the yarn-level cloth geometry on top of an underlying deforming mesh in a mechanics-aware fashion. Using triangle strains to interpolate precomputed yarn geometry, they are able to reproduce effects such as knit loops tightening under stretching.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%