2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical thrombectomy: Determining the proportion of eligible acute ischemic stroke patients in the cohort of single academic stroke center

Abstract: Among AIS patients, in whom onset-to-arrival time allowed to initiate the endovascular procedure within 6h of symptom duration, 21% were eligible for MT treatment according to more and 33% to less restrictive criteria. It accounts for about 6% and 9% of all AIS cases, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of AIS patients treated by means of IVT or MT has increased significantly in recent years [7][8][9]. As shown in other studies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], we found that MT used to treat AIS in anticoagulated patients did not change long-term outcomes compared to non-coagulated AIS patients treated by MT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The number of AIS patients treated by means of IVT or MT has increased significantly in recent years [7][8][9]. As shown in other studies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], we found that MT used to treat AIS in anticoagulated patients did not change long-term outcomes compared to non-coagulated AIS patients treated by MT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Kim et al found that mechanical thrombectomy cost $10,840 more than medical therapy alone. 12 When one considers that stroke affects approximately 800,000 individuals per year and approximately 33% may be eligible for mechanical thrombectomy, 21 the annual incremental cost becomes exorbitant. Despite these costs, mechanical thrombectomy has been shown in multiple recent analyses to be cost effective, primarily because of resultant reductions and related costs in long-term disability and need for rehabilitation at long-term care facilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter has been shown to have higher recanalisation rates and provide better functional outcomes than IVT alone in the setting of radiologically confirmed large vessel occlusion (LVO) [7,8]. It is thus considered as the mainstay of therapy in this selected group of patients [9]. IVT is recommended as the bridging therapy for MT treatment [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%