2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical, thermal and hydrodegradation behavior of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) composites with agricultural fibers as reinforcing fillers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher surface energy of SiC nanoparticles and better interaction between AAFHF, SiC nanoparticles and UPR resulted in compact and firm hybrid composite specimen F with better wear-resistant characteristics. 42 The minimum number of voids and other damages like fiber pull-out and AAFHF-UPR debonding witnessed in the wear surface SEM image of composite specimen F shown in Figure 6c further supports the better wear resistance property of composite specimen F. Deterioration is noticed in the wear property of composite specimen G with 4 wt% of SiC nanoparticles as filler material. The reason for the poor wear property in composite specimen G is the aggregation of SiC nanoparticles in the composite thereby affects the interaction between the AAFHF, SiC nanoparticle and UPR thus favoring void formation, AAFHF-UPR debonding and AAFHF pull-outs paving way for poor wear properties.…”
Section: Wear Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher surface energy of SiC nanoparticles and better interaction between AAFHF, SiC nanoparticles and UPR resulted in compact and firm hybrid composite specimen F with better wear-resistant characteristics. 42 The minimum number of voids and other damages like fiber pull-out and AAFHF-UPR debonding witnessed in the wear surface SEM image of composite specimen F shown in Figure 6c further supports the better wear resistance property of composite specimen F. Deterioration is noticed in the wear property of composite specimen G with 4 wt% of SiC nanoparticles as filler material. The reason for the poor wear property in composite specimen G is the aggregation of SiC nanoparticles in the composite thereby affects the interaction between the AAFHF, SiC nanoparticle and UPR thus favoring void formation, AAFHF-UPR debonding and AAFHF pull-outs paving way for poor wear properties.…”
Section: Wear Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This is supported by the wear surface SEM image of composite specimen E shown in Figure 6b with fewer damages compared to composite specimen D. The least weight loss and better wear resistance property was noticed for the composite specimen F with 3 wt% of SiC nanoparticle filler material. The higher surface energy of SiC nanoparticles and better interaction between AAFHF, SiC nanoparticles and UPR resulted in compact and firm hybrid composite specimen F with better wear‐resistant characteristics 42 . The minimum number of voids and other damages like fiber pull‐out and AAFHF‐UPR debonding witnessed in the wear surface SEM image of composite specimen F shown in Figure 6c further supports the better wear resistance property of composite specimen F.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, a de-polymerization of the polyester can be performed and at the same time to preserve the cellulose in cotton and recover both. Finally, other paths may be applicable, such as to reuse these fibers for composite and nonwoven production, and dye production via extraction [44][45][46][47]. Fig.…”
Section: Chemical Fractionation And/or Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biocomposites containing lignocellulosic fractions combined with biopolymers from natural sources would be an ideal solution to obtain sustainable materials. Lignocellulosic materials represent a renewable, biodegradable, lightweight, and abundant source, making them attractive for the development of sustainable products [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Among other renewable alternatives, cork-polymer biocomposites (CPCs) have attracted the attention of scientists and companies [ 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%