2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical testing and microstructural analysis of wire arc additively manufactured steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, these differences were not found. Only the elongation was minimally affected by the directionality, being higher in the horizontal direction, which corresponds to that reported by Reference [ 19 ]. The presence of a mechanical result independent of the direction of specimen extraction had already been reported in a recent comprehensive study on mechanical properties by Huang et al [ 20 ] wherein the influence of specimen direction, specimen preparation and deposition strategy was studied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, these differences were not found. Only the elongation was minimally affected by the directionality, being higher in the horizontal direction, which corresponds to that reported by Reference [ 19 ]. The presence of a mechanical result independent of the direction of specimen extraction had already been reported in a recent comprehensive study on mechanical properties by Huang et al [ 20 ] wherein the influence of specimen direction, specimen preparation and deposition strategy was studied.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In some works from the literature, it is reported that the extraction direction of the specimen has an influence on the mechanical properties. For example, Sun et al [ 19 ] report differences of 10% and 4% in YS and UTS, respectively, and up to 21% in elongation at fracture, assuming that this is related to the density of interfaces between beads, being higher in the vertical test direction. In this work, these differences were not found.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material anisotropy was found to be rather mild, with the variations in the Young's modulus, yield and ultimate tensile strengths due to material anisotropy all being within 10%. The strength of the thicker material was found to be consistently lower than the strength of the thinner material, with differences of up to 23% and 17% for the yield and ultimate tensile strengths, respectively; this is attributed to the slower cooling rate of the thicker material [44].…”
Section: Materials Testsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In [13] comparison between GMAW and CMTAW was performed for machined coupons extracted from a machined tube and it was concluded that CMT process provides finer grain size and that there is a difference between the specimens extracted from the top and from the bottom of the printed tube. In [14] different building sequences were applied, in addition to different wall thicknesses and wire materials. A common conclusion was that there is not a noticeable anisotropy in the behavior for carbon steel WAAM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group of studies was performed on carbon steel material ER70S-6 [7], [8], [13], [14]. They covered similar parameters as the equivalent studies for stainless steel mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%