2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical strength and hydrophobicity of cotton fabric after plasma treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it was found that lower frequency and lower discharge voltage were necessary to control the degree of fragmentation of styrene in order to obtain high degree of hydrophobicity. Similarly, other studies [92][93][94][95] highlighted that SF 6 plasma treatments significantly enhanced the hydrophobic nature of cotton, silk, and mixed cottonsilk woven fabrics and that the imparted hydrophobicity appeared to be durable as long as the fabric was not washed [95]. This result was attributed to both surface etching and surface fluorination of the fabric fibers confirmed by X-ray photoelectron analysis.…”
Section: Natural Materialssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Moreover, it was found that lower frequency and lower discharge voltage were necessary to control the degree of fragmentation of styrene in order to obtain high degree of hydrophobicity. Similarly, other studies [92][93][94][95] highlighted that SF 6 plasma treatments significantly enhanced the hydrophobic nature of cotton, silk, and mixed cottonsilk woven fabrics and that the imparted hydrophobicity appeared to be durable as long as the fabric was not washed [95]. This result was attributed to both surface etching and surface fluorination of the fabric fibers confirmed by X-ray photoelectron analysis.…”
Section: Natural Materialssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In Figure 9a, it is observed that the cellulose became hydrophobic immediately after exposure to plasma for all treatment time conditions established. The effect of hydrophobicity obtained by the material can be explained by the removal of hydroxyl groups by fluorine plasma, providing the diminishment of the hydrophilicity property of cellulose, as demonstrated by Hodak et al 30 and Kamlangkla et al 31 . Furthermore, according to Vaswani et al 48 , the presence of fluorine on cellulose surface contributes to the reduction of the surface energy, thereby promoting increased contact angle values, as the values obtained with water and exceeding 120º.…”
Section: Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The plasma composition is another parameter that can strongly affect the properties of the substrate. In some cases, not only the topography but also the surface energy can be changed in a single step, by the choice of a different kind of precursor gas 30,31 . Besides being a flexible technique, the plasma treatment can also easily be extended to an industrial scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using plasmas to tailor-fit textile functionalities is a novel approach that reduces air, water and land pollution in comparison to conventional methods of wet chemistry [2]. Plasmas modify the surface layer of the textile substrate causing changes to a limited depth only, thereby leaving the bulk characteristics unaffected [3,4]. Depending on the choice of plasma conditions, the treatment can lead to hydrophilization or hydrophobization of textiles, improvement of dyeability; printability; adhesion properties; improvement of thermo-physiological comfort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%